Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33189789›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2021

Nanoparticle delivery improves the pharmacokinetic properties of cyclic dinucleotide STING agonists to open a therapeutic window for intravenous administration.

Mohamed Wehbe, Lihong Wang-Bishop, Kyle W Becker, Daniel Shae, Jessalyn J Baljon, Xinyi He, Plamen Christov, Kelli L Boyd, Justin M Balko, John T Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Peptide vaccine formulations with structurally distinct STING agonist drugamers induce discrete, efficacious antitumor responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed WehbeDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Lihong Wang-BishopDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Kyle W BeckerDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Daniel ShaeDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Jessalyn J BaljonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Xinyi HeDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Plamen ChristovVanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Kelli L BoydDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States; Vanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology, and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Justin M BalkoDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
John T WilsonDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States; Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, United States; Vanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology, and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States. Electronic address: john.t.wilson@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
TISSUE CoreP50CA098131 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARK, BEN HO, PIETENPOL, JENNIFER A · 2003 to 2024
$48.7M
Translational Analysis CoreP30DK058404 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICHARD M. PEEK · 2002 to 2026
$29.9M
Expanding the Therapeutic Window of Nanoparticle STING Agonists for Cancer ImmunotherapyR01CA245134 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, JOHN TANNER · 2020 to 2025
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098131NCI NIH HHS R01 CA245134NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK058404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway plays an important role in the immune surveillance of cancer and, accordingly, agonists of STING signaling have recently emerged as promising therapeutics for remodeling of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and enhancing response rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors. 2'3'-cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate (2'3'-cGAMP) is the endogenous ligand for STING, but is rapidly metabolized and poorly membrane permeable, restricting its use to intratumoral administration. Nanoencapsulation has been shown to allow for systemic administration of cGAMP and other cyclic dinucleotides (CDN), but little is known about how nanocarriers affect important pharmacological properties that impact the efficacy and safety of CDNs. Using STING-activating nanoparticles (STING-NPs) - a polymersome platform designed to enhance cGAMP delivery - we investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships that underlie the ability of intravenously (i.v.) administered STING-NPs to induce STING activation and inhibit tumor growth. First, we demonstrate that nanoencapsulation improves the half-life of encapsulated cGAMP by 40-fold, allowing for sufficient accumulation of cGAMP in tumors and activation of the STING pathway in the TME as assessed by western blot analysis and gene expression profiling. Nanoparticle delivery also changes the biodistribution profile, resulting in increased cGAMP accumulation and STING activation in the liver and spleen, which we identify as dose limiting organs. As a consequence of STING activation in tumors, i.v. administered STING-NPs reprogram the TME towards a more immunogenic antitumor milieu, characterized by an influx of >20-fold more CD4

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNanoparticlesAdministration, IntravenousCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesMembrane ProteinsTissue DistributionMembrane ProteinscGAMPcGAS-STINGImmune checkpoint blockadeImmunotherapyNanoparticlePharmacokineticsPolymersome

Identifiers

PMID33189789
PMCPMC9008741
OpenAlexW3103204231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.