ArticleBiophysical journal2020
Scanning Super-Resolution Imaging in Enclosed Environment by Laser Tweezer Controlled Superlens.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical Tweezers in Emulsion Research: Principles, Advances, and Prospects.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Review
- Label free super resolution imaging with photonic nanojets from tunable tapered optical fibers.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Acoustofluidic scanning fluorescence nanoscopy with a large field of view.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Super-resolution imaging using microspheres has attracted tremendous scientific attention recently because it has managed to overcome the diffraction limit and allowed direct optical imaging of structures below 100 nm without the aid of fluorescent microscopy. To allow imaging of specific areas on the surface of samples, the migration of the microspheres to specific locations on two-dimensional planes should be controlled to be as precise as possible. The common approach involves the attachment of microspheres on the tip of a probe. However, this technology requires additional space for the probe and could not work in an enclosed environment, e.g., in a microfluidic enclosure, thereby reducing the range of potential applications for microlens-based super-resolution imaging. Herein, we explore the use of laser trapping to manipulate microspheres to achieve super-resolution imaging in an enclosed microfluidic environment. We have demonstrated that polystyrene microsphere lenses could be manipulated to move along designated routes to image features that are smaller than the optical diffraction limit. For example, a silver nanowire with a diameter of 90 nm could be identified and imaged. In addition, a mosaic image could be constructed by fusing a sequence of images of a sample in an enclosed environment. Moreover, we have shown that it is possible to image Escherichia coli bacteria attached on the surface of an enclosed microfluidic device with this method. This technology is expected to provide additional super-resolution imaging opportunities in enclosed environments, including microfluidic, lab-on-a-chip, and organ-on-a-chip devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.