ReviewEnvironmental research2021
How to study SARS-CoV-2 in soils?
Review in Environmental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unfolding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein through infrared and ultraviolet-C radiation based disinfection.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2022Article
- A critical review on diverse technologies for advanced wastewater treatment during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: What do we know?Journal of hazardous materials advances · 2022Review
- Perspective on the status and behaviour of SARS-CoV-2 in soil.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Review
- The role of airborne particles and environmental considerations in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.Geoscience frontiers · 2021Review
- Monitoring the presence and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in water-food-environmental compartments: State of the knowledge and research needs.Environmental research · 2021Review
- SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses in soil: An environmental outlook.Environmental research · 2021Review
- Haloculture: A system to mitigate the negative impacts of pandemics on the environment, society and economy, emphasizing COVID-19.Environmental research · 2021Review
- Performance study of a sterilization box using a combination of heat and ultraviolet light irradiation for the prevention of COVID-19.Environmental research · 2021Article
- SARS-CoV-2 and other main pathogenic microorganisms in the environment: Situation in Galicia and Spain.Environmental research · 2021Article
- SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens could be determined in liquid samples from soils.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wastewater based epidemiology is increasingly being considered as a potentially useful tool for early warning about eventual new COVID-19 outbreaks. In addition, some authors are investigating on the detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in sewage sludge. However, no paper has been published up to date indicating how this virus could be quantified in soil samples. In view of that, we review available data searching for methodological approaches that could guide on the quantification of SARS-CoV-2 (and even other pathogenic microorganisms) in soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.