Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33188713›Full record

Trial reportLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2021

Pattern of progression in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with ramucirumab.

Maria Reig, Peter R Galle, Masatoshi Kudo, Richard Finn, Josep M Llovet, Andrea L Metti, William R Schelman, Kun Liang, Chunxiao Wang, Ryan C Widau and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pattern of progression in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with ramucirumab.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2021
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Progression patterns and therapeutic sequencing following immune checkpoint inhibition for hepatocellular carcinoma: An international observational study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2023
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Pattern of progression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for second-line clinical trials.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Maria ReigBarcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona. IDIBAPS. CIBERehd. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-9534
Peter R GalleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8294-0992
Masatoshi KudoDepartments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4102-3474
Richard FinnDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2494-2126
Josep M LlovetMount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0547-2667
Andrea L MettiSyneos Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4467-5304
William R SchelmanEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kun LiangEli Lilly and Company, Branchburg, NJ, USA.
Chunxiao WangEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ryan C WidauEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Paolo AbadaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Andrew X ZhuMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4873-5033
Eli Lilly (United States) · USCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESHarvard University · USInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKindai University · JPSyneos Health (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 26813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsRadiological progression patterns to first-line sorafenib have been associated with post-progression and overall survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, but these associations remain unknown for therapies in second- and later-line settings. This post hoc analysis of REACH and REACH-2 examined outcomes by radiological progression patterns in the second-line setting of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with ramucirumab or placebo.

methodsPatients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, Child-Pugh A and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 or 1 with prior sorafenib were randomized to receive ramucirumab 8mg/kg or placebo every 2 weeks. Among 625 patients with ≥1 progression pattern (new extrahepatic lesion [including new macrovascular invasion], new intrahepatic lesion, extrahepatic growth or intrahepatic growth), data were analysed by trial and for pooled individual patient data for REACH-2 and REACH (alpha-fetoprotein ≥400 ng/mL). Cox models evaluated prognostic implications of progression patterns on overall and post-progression survival.

resultsPost-progression survival was worse among those with new extrahepatic lesions in REACH (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.51-3.60), REACH-2 (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.72-3.08) and the pooled population (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.12-2.74) compared to other progression patterns. Overall survival was also significantly reduced in those with new extrahepatic lesions across studies. Ramucirumab provided an overall survival benefit across progression patterns, including patients with new extrahepatic lesions (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.80) in the pooled population.

conclusionsThe emergence of new extrahepatic lesions in the second-line setting is a poor prognostic factor for post-progression survival. The benefit of ramucirumab for overall survival was consistent across progression patterns.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRamucirumabSorafenibTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsRamucirumabSorafenibbest supportive caredisease progression patternsnew extrahepatic lesionpost-progression survivalramucirumab

Identifiers

PMID33188713
PMCPMC7898500
OpenAlexW3105140247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.