Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33188655›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2021

Efficacy and application of a novel topical anaesthetic wound formulation for treating cattle with Foot-and-Mouth disease: A field trial in Cameroon.

Sevidzem S Lendzele, Jacques F Mavoungou, Kong A Burinyuy, Koumba A Armel, Simon J Dickmu, James R Young, Peter C Thomson, Peter A Windsor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sevidzem S LendzeleInstitut de recherche en Ecologie Tropicale (IRET-CENAREST), Libreville, Gabon.
Jacques F MavoungouInstitut de recherche en Ecologie Tropicale (IRET-CENAREST), Libreville, Gabon.
Kong A BurinyuySchool of Veterinary Science and Medicine, University of Ngaoundéré, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon.
Koumba A ArmelInstitut de recherche en Ecologie Tropicale (IRET-CENAREST), Libreville, Gabon.
Simon J DickmuThe National Veterinary Laboratory (LANAVET), Garoua North, Cameroon.
James R YoungSydney School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Peter C ThomsonSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Peter A WindsorSydney School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5629-3517
Institut Africain d'Informatique · GAThe University of Sydney · AUNational Radiation Protection Agency of Cameroon · CMUniversity of Ngaoundéré · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, a wound dressing formulation, (Tri-Solfen®, Medical Ethics Pty Ltd, Australia; TS) registered for use in ruminant husbandry in Australia, was registered for Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) therapy in large ruminants in Laos, following clinical observations of improved welfare and healing following treatment of FMD lesions. In November 2019, an FMD outbreak in Cameroon provided an opportunity for a field trial, comparing clinical responses and recoveries to treatments on a sample of cattle (n = 36) comprising three equal groups of animals (n = 12), comparing responses to three treatments: (i) the application to lesions of TS, (ii) the administration of parenteral oxytetraycline commonly used for FMD in Cameroon; and (iii) an untreated control group (C). Appetite scores, lesion healing scores, and changes in dimensions of lesions, were recorded over a 15-day study period. Cattle treated with TS achieved both superior appetite and lesion healing scores with more rapid reduction in dimensions of lesions than other groups. Farmer observations indicated the TS treatment group had a more rapid return to eating with cessation of excessive salivation, and more rapid return of mobility (walking) with absence of overt lameness. The findings indicate that although mortality is usually low in FMD outbreaks, the disease is a debilitating and painful disorder with negative animal welfare impacts that should be addressed. All farmers expressed their desire that the product be made available for use in their region and modelling indicates that TS therapy imposes no additional financial burden on farmers, with the treatment likely to be provided at a similar or reduced cost to current treatment choices. As use of antibiotics for treatment of a viral disease potentially increases pressures for development of antimicrobial resistance and residues in the food chain, TS as an alternative non-antimicrobial therapy should be promoted for wider use in FMD outbreaks.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusAnesthetics, LocalAnimalsCameroonCattleDisease OutbreaksRuminantsAnesthetics, Localanimal welfareCamerooncattlefoot-and-mouth diseasetherapeutic efficacy

Identifiers

PMID33188655
PMCPMC8359326
OpenAlexW3100085879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.