ArticleSkeletal radiology2021
Additive values of pelvic tomosynthesis in comparison to pelvic radiography alone for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in patients with suspected axial spondyloarthritis.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fully automated measurement on coronal alignment of lower limbs using deep convolutional neural networks on radiographic images.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Digital Tomosynthesis versus Conventional Radiography for Evaluating Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.Korean journal of radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare inter-reader agreement and diagnostic confidence in detecting sacroiliitis by the modified New York criteria (mNY) on digital radiography (DR) versus digital pelvic tomosynthesis assisted DR (DR+DPT), and to evaluate changes in the presence of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria.
methodsOne hundred and thirty-eight patients who underwent both DR and DPT with suspicious axSpA in our rheumatologic clinic were included from February 2017 to February 2018. Three radiologists independently graded sacroiliitis and confidence level on DR first and then re-graded them on DPT in a paired manner. Agreement, confidence, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated for readers. Changes in the presence of disease by mNY and ASAS criteria were assessed between DR alone and DR+DPT.
resultsOn DR alone, 73 patients were assessed with radiographic sacroiliitis, and 85 were classified into axSpA by the ASAS criteria; however, 78 and 85, respectively, were classified on DR+DPT. With the assistance of DPT, 17 and 12 patients changed to the disease positivity according to the mNY and ASAS criteria, respectively; the negative results changed to positive in 11 and six patients, respectively. For all readers, agreement improved with DPT (0.79 to 0.89). DR+DPT achieved higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC, P < 0.05).
conclusionThe combination of DR and DPT achieved a higher diagnostic performance than that of DR alone, with better agreement. On DR+DPT, the diagnoses of 9.0% of patients with suspicious axSpA (12 of 134) were changed to the status of disease by the ASAS criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.