ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2020
Automatic detection and characterization of quantitative phase images of thalassemic red blood cells using a mask region-based convolutional neural network.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A dual-modal machine learning framework integrating red blood indices and smartphone-captured microscopic images for β-thalassemia screening.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Analysis of erythrocyte deformation characteristics based on dual-angle Mueller matrix measurement.Frontiers of optoelectronics · 2025Article
- Unstained Blood Smear Analysis: A Review of Rule-Based, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Techniques.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Review
- Advancing Laboratory Medicine Practice With Machine Learning: Swift yet Exact.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2025Review
- Biophysical profiling of red blood cells from thin-film blood smears using deep learning.Heliyon · 2024Article
- [Chinese expert consensus on the technical and clinical practice specifications of artificial intelligence assisted morphology examination of blood cells (2024)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2024Article
- Automatic Image Segmentation of Monocytes and Index Computation Using Deep Learning.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2022Article
- Machine learning-based approaches for identifying human blood cells harboring CRISPR-mediated fetal chromatin domain ablations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Self-supervised pretraining for transferable quantitative phase image cell segmentation.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Red Blood Cell Classification Based on Attention Residual Feature Pyramid Network.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
significanceLabel-free quantitative phase imaging is a promising technique for the automatic detection of abnormal red blood cells (RBCs) in real time. Although deep-learning techniques can accurately detect abnormal RBCs from quantitative phase images efficiently, their applications in diagnostic testing are limited by the lack of transparency. More interpretable results such as morphological and biochemical characteristics of individual RBCs are highly desirable.
aimAn end-to-end deep-learning model was developed to efficiently discriminate thalassemic RBCs (tRBCs) from healthy RBCs (hRBCs) in quantitative phase images and segment RBCs for single-cell characterization. APPROACH: Two-dimensional quantitative phase images of hRBCs and tRBCs were acquired using digital holographic microscopy. A mask region-based convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN) model was trained to discriminate tRBCs and segment individual RBCs. Characterization of tRBCs was achieved utilizing SHapley Additive exPlanation analysis and canonical correlation analysis on automatically segmented RBC phase images.
resultsThe implemented model achieved 97.8% accuracy in detecting tRBCs. Phase-shift statistics showed the highest influence on the correct classification of tRBCs. Associations between the phase-shift features and three-dimensional morphological features were revealed.
conclusionsThe implemented Mask R-CNN model accurately identified tRBCs and segmented RBCs to provide single-RBC characterization, which has the potential to aid clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.