Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33188443›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021

[Opacification of intraocular lenses: laboratory and clinical findings].

Ramin Khoramnia, Timur M Yildirim, Grzegorz Łabuz, Christian S Mayer, Gerd U Auffarth

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Postoperative opacification of intraocular lens: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. [Liquefied after-cataract].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Material properties of intraocular lenses: are there patient-relevant differences?]Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramin KhoramniaThe David J Apple Center for Vision Research, Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. ramin.khoramnia@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-7773
Timur M YildirimThe David J Apple Center for Vision Research, Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Grzegorz ŁabuzThe David J Apple Center for Vision Research, Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Christian S MayerThe David J Apple Center for Vision Research, Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Gerd U AuffarthThe David J Apple Center for Vision Research, Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Augenklinik Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince their introduction the spectrum of complications of intraocular lenses (IOLs) has changed. Clouding of the IOL material is increasingly described in the literature as a reason for explantation.

objectiveThis study aimed to give an overview of the various pathologies of IOL material. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe currently relevant types of IOL material opacities are summarized as well as their effects on the optical quality. RESULTS AND

conclusionIn current IOL models calcification can occur in lenses made of hydrophilic acrylate, while in IOLs made of hydrophobic acrylate "glistenings" can develop. These different material opacifications have varying impacts on optical quality parameters and in general lead to an increased intraocular light scattering. In the case of intolerable IOL material opacification, the only treatment option is its removal and the implantation of a new IOL.

Indexed as

CalcinosisLenses, IntraocularDevice RemovalHumansLaboratoriesPostoperative ComplicationsGlisteningsHydrophilic acrylateHydrophobic acrylateIOL calcificationPolymer

Identifiers

PMID33188443
PMCPMC8260513
OpenAlexW3105200522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.