ArticleBritish dental journal2020
An evaluation of civilian and military dental foundation training.
Article in British dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An exploration of the impact of working in pairs on the dental clinical learning environment: Students' views.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim There is little available material relating to the quality of continuing professional development for dental professionals and no studies to investigate whether dental foundation training (DFT) is meeting its aims and objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the components of DFT within the military and Oxford deaneries from the perspective of the educational supervisors (ESs) and foundation trainees (FTs).Method Questionnaires were sent to all 124 FTs and ESs involved in DFT in the Oxfordshire and military deaneries between 2012 to 2015. Following thematic analysis of the free text from the questionnaires, an interview guide was produced which mapped the main themes for a series of semi-structured interviews.Results Sixty-six questionnaires were returned (53% response rate) from 18 military and 3 Oxford ESs (21), and 30 military and 15 Oxford FTs (45). Eighteen interviews were carried out (6 ES/12 FT). The questionnaires highlighted the educational benefit of workplace-based assessments, joint clinical sessions and the importance of an ES as a positive role model, while the interviews highlighted the facilitative benefit of effective supervision, timely feedback, practice-wide teamwork, appropriate assessments and formal/informal peer review.Conclusions This study demonstrates the benefit of creating an optimal learning environment for DFT within the context of professional and ethical organisational support and appropriate clinical resources. ESs have a critical part to play as professional and clinical role models, and in ensuring an accountable and formal educational delivery, targeted learning goals, flexible delivery and timely feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33188345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.