Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33188345›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2020

An evaluation of civilian and military dental foundation training.

Mark Richardson, Mark Dermont

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. An exploration of the impact of working in pairs on the dental clinical learning environment: Students' views.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark RichardsonGroup Captain, Chief Dental Officer (Defence), Defence Primary Healthcare (Dental), DMS Whittington, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS14 9PY, UK. mark.richardson275@mod.gov.uk.
Mark DermontWing Commander, Consultant in Dental Public Health, Defence Public Health Unit, DMS Whittington, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS14 9PY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim There is little available material relating to the quality of continuing professional development for dental professionals and no studies to investigate whether dental foundation training (DFT) is meeting its aims and objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the components of DFT within the military and Oxford deaneries from the perspective of the educational supervisors (ESs) and foundation trainees (FTs).Method Questionnaires were sent to all 124 FTs and ESs involved in DFT in the Oxfordshire and military deaneries between 2012 to 2015. Following thematic analysis of the free text from the questionnaires, an interview guide was produced which mapped the main themes for a series of semi-structured interviews.Results Sixty-six questionnaires were returned (53% response rate) from 18 military and 3 Oxford ESs (21), and 30 military and 15 Oxford FTs (45). Eighteen interviews were carried out (6 ES/12 FT). The questionnaires highlighted the educational benefit of workplace-based assessments, joint clinical sessions and the importance of an ES as a positive role model, while the interviews highlighted the facilitative benefit of effective supervision, timely feedback, practice-wide teamwork, appropriate assessments and formal/informal peer review.Conclusions This study demonstrates the benefit of creating an optimal learning environment for DFT within the context of professional and ethical organisational support and appropriate clinical resources. ESs have a critical part to play as professional and clinical role models, and in ensuring an accountable and formal educational delivery, targeted learning goals, flexible delivery and timely feedback.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, GraduateFeedbackHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.