Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33188220›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparing distress of mouse models for liver damage.

Guanglin Tang, Nico Seume, Christine Häger, Simone Kumstel, Kerstin Abshagen, André Bleich, Brigitte Vollmar, Steven R Talbot, Xianbin Zhang, Dietmar Zechner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Predictive Accuracy of Methods Commonly Used for Evaluating Animal Distress.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The 3Rs in Experimental Liver Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Distress Analysis of Mice with Cervical Arteriovenous Fistulas.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guanglin TangRudolf-Zenker, Institute of Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Nico SeumeRudolf-Zenker, Institute of Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Christine HägerInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Simone KumstelRudolf-Zenker, Institute of Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Kerstin AbshagenRudolf-Zenker, Institute of Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
André BleichInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Brigitte VollmarRudolf-Zenker, Institute of Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Steven R TalbotInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany. talbot.steven@mh-hannover.de.
Xianbin ZhangRudolf-Zenker, Institute of Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany. zhangxianbin@hotmail.com.
Dietmar ZechnerRudolf-Zenker, Institute of Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany. dietmar.zechner@uni-rostock.de.
University of Rostock · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to foster animal welfare as well as high quality of research, many countries regulate by law that the severity of animal experiments must be evaluated and considered when performing biomedical research. It is well accepted that multiple parameters rather than a single readout parameter should be applied to describe animal distress or suffering. However, since the performance of readout parameters for animal distress is rarely defined and methods for multivariate analysis have only in rare cases been used, it is not known which methodology is most appropriate to define animal distress. This study used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to quantify the performance of burrowing activity, body weight change and a distress score of mice after induction of liver damage by bile duct ligation or carbon tetrachloride. In addition, Support Vector Machine classification was used to compare the distress of these mouse models. This approach demonstrated that bile duct ligation causes much more distress than carbon tetrachloride-induced liver damage. This study, therefore, provides a prototype how to compare two animal models by considering several readout parameters. In the future these or similar methods for multivariate analysis will be necessary, when assessing and comparing the severity of animal models.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalLiver DiseasesAnimalsCarbon TetrachlorideLiverLiver CirrhosisMiceCarbon Tetrachloride

Identifiers

PMID33188220
PMCPMC7666197
OpenAlexW3106038396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.