Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33187526›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2020

Combining epigenetic and clinicopathological variables improves specificity in prognostic prediction in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Emma Andersson-Evelönn, Linda Vidman, David Källberg, Mattias Landfors, Xijia Liu, Börje Ljungberg, Magnus Hultdin, Patrik Rydén, Sofie Degerman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma Andersson-EvelönnDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Linda VidmanDepartment of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
David KällbergDepartment of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Mattias LandforsDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Xijia LiuDepartment of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Börje LjungbergDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Magnus HultdinDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Patrik RydénDepartment of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. patrik.ryden@umu.se.
Sofie DegermanDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. sofie.degerman@umu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2783-0712
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastasized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Almost one-third of patients with non-metastatic tumors at diagnosis will later progress with metastatic disease. These patients need to be identified already at diagnosis, to undertake closer follow up and/or adjuvant treatment. Today, clinicopathological variables are used to risk classify patients, but molecular biomarkers are needed to improve risk classification to identify the high-risk patients which will benefit most from modern adjuvant therapies. Interestingly, DNA methylation profiling has emerged as a promising prognostic biomarker in ccRCC. This study aimed to derive a model for prediction of tumor progression after nephrectomy in non-metastatic ccRCC by combining DNA methylation profiling with clinicopathological variables.

methodsA novel cluster analysis approach (Directed Cluster Analysis) was used to identify molecular biomarkers from genome-wide methylation array data. These novel DNA methylation biomarkers, together with previously identified CpG-site biomarkers and clinicopathological variables, were used to derive predictive classifiers for tumor progression.

resultsThe "triple classifier" which included both novel and previously identified DNA methylation biomarkers together with clinicopathological variables predicted tumor progression more accurately than the currently used Mayo scoring system, by increasing the specificity from 50% in Mayo to 64% in our triple classifier at 85% fixed sensitivity. The cumulative incidence of progress (

conclusionsThe triple classifier panel that combines clinicopathological variables with genome-wide methylation data has the potential to improve specificity in prognosis prediction for patients with non-metastatic ccRCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorClassificationClear cell renal cell carcinomaDirected cluster analysisDNA methylationPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID33187526
PMCPMC7666468
OpenAlexW3102271544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.