Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33187509›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

"Is there anything good about a water advisory?": an exploration of the consequences of drinking water advisories in an indigenous community.

Kayla J Lucier, Corinne J Schuster-Wallace, Derek Skead, Kathleen Skead, Sarah E Dickson-Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kayla J LucierDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8142-3678
Corinne J Schuster-WallaceDepartment of Geography and Planning / Global Institute for Water Security 12 Kirk Hall Building, 117 Science Place, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5C8, Canada. cschuster.wallace@usask.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0187-0326
Derek SkeadWauzhushk Onigum First Nation, Kenora, Ontario, P9N 3X8, Canada.
Kathleen SkeadWauzhushk Onigum First Nation, Kenora, Ontario, P9N 3X8, Canada.
Sarah E Dickson-AndersonDepartment of Geography and Planning / Global Institute for Water Security 12 Kirk Hall Building, 117 Science Place, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5C8, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-9214
Assembly of First Nations · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAImpact · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Ontario, Canada, Indigenous communities experience some of the province's worst drinking water, with issues ranging from deteriorating water quality to regulatory problems and lack of support. When water is known, or suspected, to be unsafe for human consumption, communities are placed under a Drinking Water Advisory. Between 2004 and 2013, approximately 70% of all on-reserve communities in Ontario were under at least one Drinking Water Advisory. Despite the widespread impact of Drinking Water Advisories on health and wellbeing, little is known about First Nation individuals' perceptions and experiences living with a Drinking Water Advisory. This study presents information shared by members of a community who have lived with Boil Water Advisories on and off for many years, and a long-term Boil Water Advisory since 2017. The goal of this paper is to unpack and explore the Boil Water Advisories from the perspective of community members and provide considerations for current and future Boil Water Advisory management.

methodsMethodological choices were driven by the principles of community-based participatory research. Two data collection methodologies were employed: hard copy surveys and interviews.

resultsForty-four individuals (19.5%) completed a survey. Eight Elders and 16 key informants participated in 20 interviews. Respondents expressed varying degrees of uncertainty regarding protective actions to take while under a Boil Water Advisory. Further, 79% of men but only 46% of women indicated they always adhere to the Boil Water Advisory. Knowledge gaps that could lead to risky behaviours were also identified. Finally, Boil Water Advisories were demonstrated to have physical, financial, and time impacts on the majority of respondents.

conclusionsA direct outcome was the identification of a critical need to reinforce best practices for health protection through community education and outreach. More broadly, Chief and Council were able to use the findings to successfully advocate for improved drinking water for the community. Additionally, benefits of participatory research and community ownership include enhanced local research capacity, and increased awareness of, and desire for, research to inform decisions.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterAgedFemaleHumansMaleOntarioSurveys and QuestionnairesWater QualityWater SupplyDrinking WaterCanadaCommunity-based participatory researchDrinking waterDrinking water advisoriesFirst NationsIndigenous healthTraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID33187509
PMCPMC7666524
OpenAlexW3102691263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.