Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33187490›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology2020

Family matters: skin microbiome reflects the social group and spatial proximity in wild zebra finches.

Kathrin Engel, Helga Pankoke, Sebastian Jünemann, Hanja B Brandl, Jan Sauer, Simon C Griffith, Jörn Kalinowski, Barbara A Caspers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ecology and evolution of the social microbiome.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathrin EngelDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. k.engel@uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3140-7992
Helga PankokeEvonik Nutrition & Care GmbH, Kantstr. 2, 33790, Halle, Germany.
Sebastian JünemannCenter for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Sequenz 1, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Hanja B BrandlInstitute of Zoology, Behavioural Biology, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan SauerDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Simon C GriffithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Jörn KalinowskiCenter for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Sequenz 1, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Barbara A CaspersDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. barbara.caspers@uni-bielefeld.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 031A533Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHU 2927/3-1Volkswagen Foundation 88137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSo far, large numbers of studies investigating the microbiome have focused on gut microbiota and less have addressed the microbiome of the skin. Especially in avian taxa our understanding of the ecology and function of these bacteria remains incomplete. The involvement of skin bacteria in intra-specific communication has recently received attention, and has highlighted the need to understand what information is potentially being encoded in bacterial communities. Using next generation sequencing techniques, we characterised the skin microbiome of wild zebra finches, aiming to understand the impact of sex, age and group composition on skin bacteria communities. For this purpose, we sampled skin swabs from both sexes and two age classes (adults and nestlings) of 12 different zebra finch families and analysed the bacterial communities.

resultsUsing 16S rRNA sequencing we found no effect of age, sex and family on bacterial diversity (alpha diversity). However, when comparing the composition (beta diversity), we found that animals of social groups (families) harbour highly similar bacterial communities on their skin with respect to community composition. Within families, closely related individuals shared significantly more bacterial taxa than non-related animals. In addition, we found that age (adults vs. nestlings) affected bacterial composition. Finally, we found that spatial proximity of nest sites, and therefore individuals, correlated with the skin microbiota similarity.

conclusionsBirds harbour very diverse and complex bacterial assemblages on their skin. These bacterial communities are distinguishable and characteristic for intraspecific social groups. Our findings are indicative for a family-specific skin microbiome in wild zebra finches. Genetics and the (social) environment seem to be the influential factors shaping the complex bacterial communities. Bacterial communities associated with the skin have a potential to emit volatiles and therefore these communities may play a role in intraspecific social communication, e.g. via signalling social group membership.

Indexed as

FinchesMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaFemaleMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSkinRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAvian olfactionBacterial communitiesFamily-specificMicrobiotaNestlingOlfactory communicationRelatednessSocial environmentSocial group

Identifiers

PMID33187490
PMCPMC7664024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.