Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33187484›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Development and utility assessment of a machine learning bloodstream infection classifier in pediatric patients receiving cancer treatments.

Lillian Sung, Conor Corbin, Ethan Steinberg, Emily Vettese, Aaron Campigotto, Loreto Lecce, George A Tomlinson, Nigam Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lillian SungDivision of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G1X8, Canada. lillian.sung@sickkids.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-3091
Conor CorbinBiomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA.
Ethan SteinbergBiomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA.
Emily VetteseDivision of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G1X8, Canada.
Aaron CampigottoDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Loreto LecceDivision of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
George A TomlinsonDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Nigam ShahBiomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAStanford University · USUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObjectives were to build a machine learning algorithm to identify bloodstream infection (BSI) among pediatric patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, and to compare this approach with presence of neutropenia to identify BSI.

methodsWe included patients 0-18 years of age at cancer diagnosis or HSCT between January 2009 and November 2018. Eligible blood cultures were those with no previous blood culture (regardless of result) within 7 days. The primary outcome was BSI. Four machine learning algorithms were used: elastic net, support vector machine and two implementations of gradient boosting machine (GBM and XGBoost). Model training and evaluation were performed using temporally disjoint training (60%), validation (20%) and test (20%) sets. The best model was compared to neutropenia alone in the test set.

resultsOf 11,183 eligible blood cultures, 624 (5.6%) were positive. The best model in the validation set was GBM, which achieved an area-under-the-receiver-operator-curve (AUROC) of 0.74 in the test set. Among the 2236 in the test set, the number of false positives and specificity of GBM vs. neutropenia were 508 vs. 592 and 0.76 vs. 0.72 respectively. Among 139 test set BSIs, six (4.3%) non-neutropenic patients were identified by GBM. All received antibiotics prior to culture result availability.

conclusionsWe developed a machine learning algorithm to classify BSI. GBM achieved an AUROC of 0.74 and identified 4.3% additional true cases in the test set. The machine learning algorithm did not perform substantially better than using presence of neutropenia alone to predict BSI.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdolescentBacteremiaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeoplasmsNeutropeniaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBloodstream infectionCancerChildrenClassifierMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID33187484
PMCPMC7666525
OpenAlexW3098801741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.