Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33187344›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Two-Phase Distributed Filtering Algorithm for Networked Uncertain Systems with Fading Measurements under Deception Attacks.

Raquel Caballero-Águila, Aurora Hermoso-Carazo, Josefa Linares-Pérez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raquel Caballero-ÁguilaDepartamento de Estadística, Universidad de Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7659-7649
Aurora Hermoso-CarazoDepartamento de Estadística, Universidad de Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8120-2162
Josefa Linares-PérezDepartamento de Estadística, Universidad de Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6853-555X

Funding

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad MTM2017-84199-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, the distributed filtering problem is addressed for a class of discrete-time stochastic systems over a sensor network with a given topology, susceptible to suffering deception attacks, launched by potential adversaries, which can randomly succeed or not with a known success probability, which is not necessarily the same for the different sensors. The system model integrates some random imperfections and features that are frequently found in real networked environments, namely: (1) fading measurements; (2) multiplicative noises in both the state and measurement equations; and (3) sensor additive noises cross-correlated with each other and with the process noise. According to the network communication scheme, besides its own local measurements, each sensor receives the measured outputs from its adjacent nodes. Based on such measurements, a recursive algorithm is designed to obtain the least-squares linear filter of the state. Thereafter, each sensor receives the filtering estimators previously obtained by its adjacent nodes, and these estimators are all fused to obtain the desired distributed filter as the minimum mean squared error matrix-weighted linear combination of them. The theoretical results are illustrated by a simulation example, where the efficiency of the developed distributed estimation strategy is discussed in terms of the error variances.

Indexed as

distributed filteringfading measurementsnetworked uncertain systemsrandom deception attacks

Identifiers

PMID33187344
PMCPMC7696952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.