ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
A Two-Phase Distributed Filtering Algorithm for Networked Uncertain Systems with Fading Measurements under Deception Attacks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distributed Optimal and Self-Tuning Filters Based on Compressed Data for Networked Stochastic Uncertain Systems with Deception Attacks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Two Compensation Strategies for Optimal Estimation in Sensor Networks with Random Matrices, Time-Correlated Noises, Deception Attacks and Packet Losses.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Globally Optimal Distributed Fusion Filter for Descriptor Systems with Time-Correlated Measurement Noises.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, the distributed filtering problem is addressed for a class of discrete-time stochastic systems over a sensor network with a given topology, susceptible to suffering deception attacks, launched by potential adversaries, which can randomly succeed or not with a known success probability, which is not necessarily the same for the different sensors. The system model integrates some random imperfections and features that are frequently found in real networked environments, namely: (1) fading measurements; (2) multiplicative noises in both the state and measurement equations; and (3) sensor additive noises cross-correlated with each other and with the process noise. According to the network communication scheme, besides its own local measurements, each sensor receives the measured outputs from its adjacent nodes. Based on such measurements, a recursive algorithm is designed to obtain the least-squares linear filter of the state. Thereafter, each sensor receives the filtering estimators previously obtained by its adjacent nodes, and these estimators are all fused to obtain the desired distributed filter as the minimum mean squared error matrix-weighted linear combination of them. The theoretical results are illustrated by a simulation example, where the efficiency of the developed distributed estimation strategy is discussed in terms of the error variances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.