ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Advances in Optical Detection of Human-Associated Pathogenic Bacteria.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reducing Biofilm Infections in Burn Patients' Wounds and Biofilms on Surfaces in Hospitals, Medical Facilities and Medical Equipment to Improve Burn Care: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Rapid Diagnostics for Distinguishing Bacterial and Viral Infections: A Review of Technologies, Clinical Utility, and Stewardship Implications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Garland Rolling Circle Amplification Mediated Self-Priming Extension Strategy for Sensitive and Label-FreeJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Bacterial species differentiation via real-time detection of microbial volatile organic compounds using a wavelength multiplexed photoionization detector and AI image-based analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Capillary microfluidics aided single-cell manipulation for optical detection of bacterial pathogens.Biophysical reviews · 2026Review
- Review
- Real-time, high-resolution metabolic characterization of live bacteria using label-free optical metabolic imaging.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Portable Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning for rapid and label-free recognition of five pathogenic bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- High-Wavenumber Raman Spectroscopy for the Identification and Biochemical Characterization of Microbial Species.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Microfluidics-Based Monitoring of Waterborne Pathogens: From Isolation to Detection.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Navigating the complex landscape of waterborne disease research.Journal of water and health · 2025Review
- Texture-based speciation of otitis media-related bacterial biofilms from optical coherence tomography images using supervised classification.Journal of biophotonics · 2024Article
- A Label-Free Fluorescent Amplification Strategy for High-Sensitive Detection ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Optimizing Excitation Light for Accurate Rapid Bacterial Species Identification with Autofluorescence.Journal of fluorescence · 2024Article
- Recent advances in microfluidic-based spectroscopic approaches for pathogen detection.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
- Review
- Gold Nanoparticle-Based Colorimetric Biosensing for Foodborne Pathogen Detection.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sensitive and Direct Analysis ofACS omega · 2023Article
- Responsive Janus droplets as modular sensory layers for the optical detection of bacteria.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Review
- Bacterial Colony Phenotyping with Hyperspectral Elastic Light Scattering Patterns.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial infection is a global burden that results in numerous hospital visits and deaths annually. The rise of multi-drug resistant bacteria has dramatically increased this burden. Therefore, there is a clinical need to detect and identify bacteria rapidly and accurately in their native state or a culture-free environment. Current diagnostic techniques lack speed and effectiveness in detecting bacteria that are culture-negative, as well as options for in vivo detection. The optical detection of bacteria offers the potential to overcome these obstacles by providing various platforms that can detect bacteria rapidly, with minimum sample preparation, and, in some cases, culture-free directly from patient fluids or even in vivo. These modalities include infrared, Raman, and fluorescence spectroscopy, along with optical coherence tomography, interference, polarization, and laser speckle. However, these techniques are not without their own set of limitations. This review summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of utilizing each of these optical tools for rapid bacteria detection and identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.