Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33187284›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Antimicrobial Resistance, Pharmacists, and Appreciative Inquiry: Development of a Novel Measurement Tool.

Rojjares Netthong, Keivan Ahmadi, Ros Kane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rojjares NetthongJoseph Banks Laboratories, School of Pharmacy, University of Lincoln, Beevor St, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9751-7564
Keivan AhmadiLincoln Medical School, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5674-2765
Ros KaneSchool of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6926-2530

Funding

Royal Thai Government AMS1116731University of Lincoln AMS1116731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a threat to achieving the United Nation's (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs). The behavior of stakeholders has directly influenced the extent of AMR and understanding underpinning knowledge and attitudes is an important step towards understanding these behaviors. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a novel questionnaire, utilizing the theory of Appreciative Inquiry, to measure knowledge and attitudes around antibiotic resistance amongst community pharmacists throughout Thailand. A survey tool was developed using the Appreciative Inquiry theory, and was piloted in a non-probability sample of practicing community pharmacists. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied and the tool validated, using a three-step psychometric validation process. A total of 373 community pharmacists participated in the study. The survey tool was found to be valid and reliable. The "Knowledge" domain of the survey tool showed an acceptable level of reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.64); while the "Attitude" domain showed an excellent reliability level (Cronbach's alpha 0.84). This new survey tool has been designed to measure attitudes and knowledge of antibiotic resistance by utilizing the Discovery phase of Appreciative Inquiry theory amongst community pharmacists in Thailand. This survey tool has the potential to be used by other researchers across different settings.

Indexed as

antibiotic smart use programantibiotic stewardshipantibiotic useantimicrobial resistanceAppreciative Inquirycommunity pharmacistreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID33187284
PMCPMC7696492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.