ArticleMicroorganisms2020
Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Based on Whole Genome Sequencing Data: Case of
Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing microbial risk assessment: perspectives from the evolution of detection technologies.NPJ science of food · 2025Review
- Using the Constrained Disorder Principle to Navigate Uncertainties in Biology and Medicine: Refining Fuzzy Algorithms.Biology · 2024Review
- A Critical Review of Risk Assessment Models forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparison of Source Attribution Methodologies for Human Campylobacteriosis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effects of UV-B radiation on epiphytic bacterial communities on male and female Sargassum thunbergii.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Source Attribution of Human Campylobacteriosis Using Whole-Genome Sequencing Data and Network Analysis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Landscape of Stress Response and Virulence Genes AmongFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The application of high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies (WGS) data remain an increasingly discussed but vastly unexplored resource in the public health domain of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). This is due to challenges including high dimensionality of WGS data and heterogeneity of microbial growth phenotype data. This study provides an innovative approach for modeling the impact of population heterogeneity in microbial phenotypic stress response and integrates this into predictive models inputting a high-dimensional WGS data for increased precision exposure assessment using an example of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.