Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33187241›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2020

Carmina Natale, Maria Monica Barzago, Luisa Diomede

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A molecular perspective of gelsolin amyloidosis: An old foe with new faces.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  4. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Modified tau leads to neuronal and global ribosome dysfunction inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Unraveling Molecular Targets for Neurodegenerative Diseases ThroughInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Towards Understanding Neurodegenerative Diseases: Insights fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Aβ1-6Molecular psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmina NataleDepartment of Molecular Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156 Milan, Italy.
Maria Monica BarzagoDepartment of Molecular Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156 Milan, Italy.
Luisa DiomedeDepartment of Molecular Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2258-0531
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · IT

Funding

Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica Care4NeuroRare CP_20/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The understanding of the genetic, biochemical, and structural determinants underlying tau aggregation is pivotal in the elucidation of the pathogenic process driving tauopathies and the design of effective therapies. Relevant information on the molecular basis of human neurodegeneration in vivo can be obtained using the nematode

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansfrontotemporal dementiamicrotubule-associated protein tauproteotoxicitytautauopathy

Identifiers

PMID33187241
PMCPMC7697895
OpenAlexW3100210934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.