Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33187161›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Disposable and Low-Cost Colorimetric Sensors for Environmental Analysis.

Giancarla Alberti, Camilla Zanoni, Lisa Rita Magnaghi, Raffaela Biesuz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giancarla AlbertiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4106-2219
Camilla ZanoniDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Lisa Rita MagnaghiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4484-4788
Raffaela BiesuzDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental contamination affects human health and reduces the quality of life. Therefore, the monitoring of water and air quality is important, ensuring that all areas are acquiescent with the current legislation. Colorimetric sensors deliver quick, naked-eye detection, low-cost, and adequate determination of environmental analytes. In particular, disposable sensors are cheap and easy-to-use devices for single-shot measurements. Due to increasing requests for in situ analysis or resource-limited zones, disposable sensors' development has increased. This review provides a brief insight into low-cost and disposable colorimetric sensors currently used for environmental analysis. The advantages and disadvantages of different colorimetric devices for environmental analysis are discussed.

Indexed as

ColorimetryEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsAir PollutionEnvironmental Pollutantscolorimetric sensorsdisposable devicesenvironmental analysisin loco analysislow-cost sensors

Identifiers

PMID33187161
PMCPMC7697538
OpenAlexW3103919486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.