ArticlePharmaceutics2020
3D Printed Calcium Phosphate Cement (CPC) Scaffolds for Anti-Cancer Drug Delivery.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Worldwide research on 3D printing for cancer: a dual-method analysis of bibliometrics and stratified focused thematic.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D-Printed Drug Delivery and Screening Platforms for Bone Disease Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Engineering of Bioresorbable Polymers for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- The Progress in Bioprinting and Its Potential Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Functionalization of Octacalcium Phosphate Bone Graft with Cisplatin and Zoledronic Acid: Physicochemical and Bioactive Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Calcium Phosphate Cements as Carriers of Functional Substances for the Treatment of Bone Tissue.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Enhanced Cell Osteogenic Differentiation in Alendronate Acid and Flufenamic Acid Drug-Impregnated Nanoparticles of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Composite Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement In Vitro.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multifunctional Three-Dimensional Printed Copper Loaded Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Alternative Geometries for 3D Bioprinting of Calcium Phosphate Cement as Bone Substitute.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Bone Tissue Engineering through 3D Bioprinting of Bioceramic Scaffolds: A Review and Update.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing in Cancer Therapy and Diagnostics: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Hot Melt Extrusion-Triggered Amorphization as a Continuous Process for Inducing Extended Supersaturable Drug Immediate-Release from saSMSDs Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Effect on Rheological Properties and 3D Printability of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Microporous Particles in Hydrocolloid-Based Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Bioinspired Modifications of PEEK Implants for Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
One of the main applications of bone graft materials is filling the gap after the surgical removal of bone cancer or tumors. Insufficient healing commonly leads to non-union fracture which could lead to cancer resurgence or infection. Emerging 3D printing of on-demand bone graft biomaterials can deliver personalized solutions with minimized risk of relapse and recurrence of cancer after bone removal surgery. This research aims to explore 3D printed calcium phosphate cement (CPC) based scaffolds as novel anti-cancer drug delivery systems to treat bone cancer. For the study, various 3D printed CPC based scaffolds (diameter 5 mm) with interconnected pores were utilized. Various optimized polymeric solutions containing a model anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was used to homogenously coat the CPC scaffolds. Both hydrophilic Soluplus (SOL) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) and a combination of both were used to develop stable coating solutions. The surface morphology of the coated scaffolds, observed via SEM, revealed deposition of the polymeric solution represented by a semi-smooth surface as opposed to the blank scaffolds that showed a smoother surface. An advanced surface analysis conducted via confocal microscopy showed a homogenous distribution of the drug throughout the coated scaffolds. Solid-state analysis studied by applying differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealed semi-crystalline nature of the drug whereas mechanical analysis conducted via texture analysis showed no evidence in the change of the mechanical properties of the scaffolds after polymeric solutions were applied. The FTIR analysis revealed no major intermolecular interactions between 5-FU and the polymers used for coatings except for F2 where a potential nominal interaction was evidenced corresponding to higher Soluplus content in the formulation. In vitro dissolution studies showed that almost 100% of the drug released within 2 h for all scaffolds. Moreover, in vitro cell culture using two different cell lines (Hek293T-human kidney immortalized cell line and HeLa-human bone osteosarcoma epithelial cell line) showed significant inhibition of cell growth as a function of decreased numbers of cells after 5 days. It can be claimed that the developed 5-FU coated 3D printed scaffolds can successfully be used as bone graft materials to potentially treat bone cancer or bone neoplasm and for personalized medical solutions in the form of scaffolds for regenerative medicine or tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.