Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33187119›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Cherry Tomato Production in Intelligent Greenhouses-Sensors and AI for Control of Climate, Irrigation, Crop Yield, and Quality.

Silke Hemming, Feije de Zwart, Anne Elings, Anna Petropoulou, Isabella Righini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Digital Twins in Agriculture: Orchestration and Applications.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Current research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Silke HemmingBusiness Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6638-7453
Feije de ZwartBusiness Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Anne ElingsBusiness Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6968-1305
Anna PetropoulouBusiness Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4311-5070
Isabella RighiniBusiness Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8714-707X

Funding

Tencent none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greenhouses and indoor farming systems play an important role in providing fresh and nutritious food for the growing global population. Farms are becoming larger and greenhouse growers need to make complex decisions to maximize production and minimize resource use while meeting market requirements. However, highly skilled labor is increasingly lacking in the greenhouse sector. Moreover, extreme events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, can make farms temporarily less accessible. This highlights the need for more autonomous and remote-control strategies for greenhouse production. This paper describes and analyzes the results of the second "Autonomous Greenhouse Challenge". In this challenge, an experiment was conducted in six high-tech greenhouse compartments during a period of six months of cherry tomato growing. The primary goal of the greenhouse operation was to maximize net profit, by controlling the greenhouse climate and crop with AI techniques. Five international teams with backgrounds in AI and horticulture were challenged in a competition to operate their own compartment remotely. They developed intelligent algorithms and use sensor data to determine climate setpoints and crop management strategy. All AI supported teams outperformed a human-operated greenhouse that served as reference. From the results obtained by the teams and from the analysis of the different climate-crop strategies, it was possible to detect challenges and opportunities for the future implementation of remote-control systems in greenhouse production.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePandemicsAgricultureBetacoronavirusClimateCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Solanum lycopersicumartificial intelligenceautonomous greenhousesclimate controldata driven growingindoor farmingirrigation controlremote controlresource use efficiencysensorstomato yield

Identifiers

PMID33187119
PMCPMC7698269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.