ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021
New Data-Driven Gated PET/CT Free of Misregistration Artifacts.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving data-driven gated (DDG) PET and CT registration in thoracic lesions: a comparison of AI registration and DDG CT.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Comments on the paper "Data-driven gating (DDG)-based motion match for improved CTAC registration. EJNMMI Physics. 2024;11(1):42."EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Data-driven gated positron emission tomography/computed tomography for radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- New full-counts phase-matched data-driven gated (DDG) PET/CT.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Correcting CT misregistration in data-driven gated (DDG) PET with PET self-gating and deformable image registration.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Reproducibility of the principal component analysis (PCA)-based data-driven respiratory gating on texture features in non-small cell lung cancer patients withJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Anatomical validation of automatic respiratory motion correction for coronary 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography by expert measurements from four-dimensional computed tomography.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Data-driven gated CT: An automated respiratory gating method to enable data-driven gated PET/CT.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Impact of low injected activity on data driven respiratory gating for PET/CT imaging with continuous bed motion.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Impact of acquisition time and misregistration with CT on data-driven gated PET.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Data-driven gated PET/CT: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation.EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe developed a new data-driven gated (DDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) to improve the registration of CT and DDG PET.
methodsWe acquired 10 repeat PET/CT and 35 cine CT scans for the mitigation of misregistration between CT and PET data. We also derived end-expiration phase CT as DDG CT for attenuation correction of DDG PET. Radiation exposure, body mass index (BMI), scan coverage, and effective radiation dose were compared between repeat PET/CT and cine CT. Of the 35 cine CT patients, 14 (capturing 59 total tumors) were compared among average PET/CT (baseline PET attenuation correction by average CT), DDG PET (DDG PET attenuation correction by baseline CT), and DDG PET/CT (DDG PET attenuation correction by DDG CT) for registration and quantification without increasing the scan time for DDG PET.
resultsCompared with repeat PET/CT, cine CT had significantly lower scan coverage (32.5 ± 11.5 cm vs 15.4 ± 4.7 cm; P < .001) and effective radiation dose (3.7 ± 2.6 mSv vs 1.3 ± 0.6 mSv; P < .01). Repeat PET/CT and cine CT did not differ significantly in BMI or radiation exposure (P > .1). Cine CT saved the scan time for not needing a repeat PET. The SUV ratios of average PET/CT, DDG PET, and DDG PET/CT to baseline PET/CT were 1.14 ± 0.28, 1.28 ± 0.20, and 1.63 ± 0.64, respectively (P < .0001), suggesting that the SUV
conclusionOur new DDG PET/CT approach alleviates misregistration artifacts and, compared with DDG PET, improves quantification and registration. The use of cine CT in our DDG PET/CT method also reduces the effective radiation dose and scan coverage compared with repeat CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.