Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33186481›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2021

Risk of cardiovascular disease following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists vs antagonists in prostate cancer: Real-world evidence from five databases.

Gincy George, Hans Garmo, Lucie-Marie Scailteux, Frédéric Balusson, Greet De Coster, Harlinde De Schutter, Josephina G Kuiper, Emmanuel Oger, Julie Verbeeck, Mieke Van Hemelrijck

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular disease risk with degarelix and GnRH agonists in prostate cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Degarelix for treating advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with degarelix: a real-world study from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cardiovascular risk in ADT recipients: does the type of ADT matter?Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Does Exist a Differential Impact of DegarelixFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Gincy GeorgeKing's College London, Translational Oncology and Urology Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0605-5507
Hans GarmoKing's College London, Translational Oncology and Urology Research, London, UK.
Lucie-Marie ScailteuxUniversity of Rennes, EA 7449 REPERES Pharmacoepidemiology and Health Services Research, Rennes, France.
Frédéric BalussonUniversity of Rennes, EA 7449 REPERES Pharmacoepidemiology and Health Services Research, Rennes, France.
Greet De CosterBelgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium.
Harlinde De SchutterBelgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium.
Josephina G KuiperPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emmanuel OgerRennes Hospital University, Pharmacovigilance Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Information Center, Rennes, France.
Julie VerbeeckBelgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium.
Mieke Van HemelrijckKing's College London, Translational Oncology and Urology Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7317-0858
King's College London · GBStichting tegen Kanker · BEUniversité de Rennes · FRPharmo Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational studies in prostate cancer (PCa) have shown an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) following gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, whereas randomised-controlled trials have shown no associations. Compared to GnRH agonists, GnRH antagonists have shown less atherosclerotic effects in preclinical models. We used real-world data from five countries to investigate CVD risk following GnRH agonists and antagonists in PCa men. Data sources included cancer registries, primary and secondary healthcare databases. CVD event was defined as an incident or fatal CVD. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Stratified analyses were conducted by history of CVD and age (75 years). A total of 48 757 men were on GnRH agonists and 2144 on GnRH antagonists. There was no difference in risk of any CVD for men on GnRH antagonists and agonists (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.96-1.61; I

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCardiovascular DiseasesDatabases, FactualGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalGonadotropin-Releasing Hormonecardiovascular diseaseGnRH agonistsGnRH antagonistsprostate cancerreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID33186481
PMCPMC8049028
OpenAlexW3105765590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.