Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33186450›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Assessing automated product selection success rates in transmissions between electronic prescribing and community pharmacy platforms.

Jennifer Panich, Natalee Larson, Luanne Sojka, Zach Wallace, James Lokken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer PanichClinical Pharmacy Services, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Natalee LarsonClinical Pharmacy Services, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Luanne SojkaClinical Pharmacy Services, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Zach WallaceClinical Pharmacy Services, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
James LokkenClinical Pharmacy Services, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWrong drug product errors occurring in community pharmacies often originate at the transcription stage. Electronic prescribing and automated product selection are strategies to reduce product selection errors. However, it is unclear how often automated product selection succeeds in outpatient pharmacy platforms. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe intake of over 800 e-prescriptions was observed at baseline and after intervention to assess the rate of automated product selection success. A dispensing accuracy audit was performed at baseline and postintervention to determine whether enhanced automated product selection would result in greater accuracy; data for both analyses were compared by 2x2 Chi square tests. In addition, an anonymous survey was sent to a convenience sample of 60 area community pharmacy managers.

resultsAt baseline, 79.8% of 888 e-prescriptions achieved automated product selection. After the intervention period, 84.5% of 903 e-prescriptions achieved automated product selection (P = .008). Analysis of dispensing accuracy audits detected a slight but not statistically significant improvement in accuracy rate (99.3% versus 98.9%, P = .359). Fourteen surveys were returned, revealing that other community pharmacies experience similar automated product selection failure rates. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that manual product selection by pharmacy personnel is required for a higher than anticipated proportion of e-prescriptions received and filled by community pharmacies, which may pose risks to both medication safety and efficiency.

conclusionThe question of how to increase automated product selection rates and enhance interoperability between prescriber and community pharmacy platforms warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesElectronic PrescribingMedication ErrorsDrug PrescriptionsHealth Information InteroperabilityHumansPharmacistsRxNormSurveys and Questionnairesautomated product selectionE-prescribingnational drug code (NDC)RxNorm, medication errors

Identifiers

PMID33186450
PMCPMC7810461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.