Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33186353›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

The safety attitudes questionnaire for out-of-hours service in primary healthcare-Psychometric properties of the Croatian version.

Jasna Mesarić, Diana Šimić, Milica Katić, Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås, Dag Hofoss, Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasna MesarićFaculty of Health Sciences, Libertas International University, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-3710-8931
Diana ŠimićFaculty of Organization and Informatics, University of Zagreb, Varaždin, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6721-7250
Milica KatićSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ellen Catharina Tveter DeilkåsThe Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, Norway.
Dag HofossLovisenberg Diaconal College, Oslo, Norway.
Gunnar Tschudi BondevikDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the reliability and construct validity of the Croatian translation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire-Ambulatory version (SAQ-AV) in the out-of-hours (OOH) primary care setting. A cross-sectional observational study using anonymous web-survey was carried out targeting a convenience sample of 358 health professionals working in the Croatian OOH primary care service. The final sample consisted of 185 questionnaires (response rate 51.7%). Psychometric properties were assessed using exploratory hierarchical factor analysis with Schmid-Leiman rotation to bifactor solution, McDonald's ω, and Cronbach's α. Five group factors were identified: Organization climate, Teamwork climate, Stress recognition, Ambulatory process of care, and Perceptions of workload. Items loading on the Stress recognition and Perceptions of workload factor had low loadings on the general factor. Cronbach's α ranged between 0.79 and 0.93. All items had corrected item-total correlation above 0.5. McDonalds' ω total for group factors ranged between 0.76 and 0.91. Values of ω general for factors Organization climate, Teamwork climate, and Ambulatory process of care ranged between 0.41 and 0.56. McDonalds' ω general for Stress recognition and Perceptions of workload were 0.13 and 0.16, respectively. Even though SAQ-AV may not be a reliable tool for international comparisons, subsets of items may be reliable tools in several national settings, including Croatia. Results confirmed that Stress recognition is not a dimension of patient safety culture, while Ambulatory process of care might be. Future studies should investigate the relationship of patient safety culture to treatment outcome.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPrimary Health CareAdultAfter-Hours CareAgedCroatiaCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33186353
PMCPMC7665828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.