Note to Physicians and Sonographers on Potential Underestimation of Acoustic Safety Indexes for Diagnostic Array Transducers.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Perception, Knowledge, Indications, and Future Prospects of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Among Medical Students in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2024
   Article
2. Hydrophone Measurements for Biomedical Ultrasound Applications: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023
   Review
3. Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022
   Article
4. Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part II: Experimental Validation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as