ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2021
Comparative proteomics of Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA
Article in Environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Propionate oxidation byApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Evidence for ecological adaptation of reductive citric acid and reverse oxidative citric acid cycles based on a survey of genomes from autotrophicFEMS microbes · 2026Review
- Electron transport across the cell envelope via multihemeFrontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
- Prediction and validation of nanowire proteins inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- The role of CsrA in controls the extracellular electron transfer and biofilm production inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Novel Insights on Extracellular Electron Transfer Networks in theMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- NonelectroactiveISME communications · 2024Article
- Characterization of the inner membrane cytochrome ImcH from Geobacter reveals its importance for extracellular electron transfer and energy conservation.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Stimulating Anaerobic Degradation of Butyrate via Syntrophomonas wolfei and Geobacter sulfurreducens: Characteristics and Mechanism.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Global transcriptional analysis of Geobacter sulfurreducens gsu1771 mutant biofilm grown on two different support structures.PloS one · 2023Article
- Biotechnological synthesis of Pd-based nanoparticle catalysts.Nanoscale advances · 2022Review
- Succinyl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase functioning in the oxidative tricarboxylic acid cycle inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Isolation and Polyphasic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Protein Engineering of Electron Transfer Components from ElectroactiveAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Proteomic Analysis of a Syntrophic Coculture ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Geobacter sulfurreducens is a model bacterium to study the degradation of organic compounds coupled to the reduction of Fe(III). The response of G. sulfurreducens to the electron donors acetate, formate, hydrogen and a mixture of all three with Fe(III) citrate as electron acceptor was studied using comparative physiological and proteomic approaches. Variations in the supplied electron donors resulted in differential abundance of proteins involved in the citric acid cycle (CAC), gluconeogenesis, electron transport, and hydrogenases and formate dehydrogenase. Our results provided new insights into the electron donor metabolism of G. sulfurreducens. Remarkably, formate was the preferred electron donor compared to acetate, hydrogen, or acetate plus hydrogen. When hydrogen was the electron donor, formate was formed, which was associated with a high abundance of formate dehydrogenase. Notably, abundant proteins of two CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.