ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2021
Expansion of the CRISPR/Cas Genome-Sculpting Toolbox: Innovations, Applications and Challenges.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR/Cas-Based Modifications for Therapeutic Applications: A Review.Molecular biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- Current Strategies for Increasing Knock-In Efficiency in CRISPR/Cas9-Based Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Bibliometric analysis on CRISPR/Cas: a potential Sherlock Holmes for disease detection.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Iron oxide-coupled CRISPR-nCas9-based genome editing assessment in mucopolysaccharidosis IVA mice.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023Article
- Immunogenicity of CRISPR therapeutics-Critical considerations for clinical translation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- The landscape of CRISPR/Cas9 for inborn errors of metabolism.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2023Review
- Exploiting the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing system for human cancers and immunotherapy.Clinical & translational immunology · 2021Review
- Strategies for High-Efficiency Mutation Using the CRISPR/Cas System.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of the versatile gene-editing technology using programmable sequence-specific endonuclease system (CRISPR-Cas9) has instigated a major upheaval in biomedical research. In a brief span of time, CRISPR/Cas has been adopted by research labs around the globe because of its potential for significant progress and applicability in terms of efficiency, versatility and simplicity. It is a breakthrough technique for systematic genetic engineering, genome labelling, epigenetic and transcriptional modulation, and multiplexed gene editing, amongst others. This review provides an illustrative overview of the current research trends using CRISPR/Cas technology. We highlight the latest developments in CRISPR/Cas technique including CRISPR imaging, discovery of novel CRISPR systems, and applications in altering the genome, epigenome or RNA in different organisms. Finally, we address the potential challenges of this technique for its future use. Development of new CRISPR/Cas systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.