Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33185858›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2021

Restorative thresholds for carious lesions in primary molars: French dentist's decisions.

M Muller-Bolla, E Aïem, C Coulot, S Doméjean

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Muller-BollaFaculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université Côte D'Azur, CHUN, Nice, France. michele.muller@univ-cotedazur.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2811-5339
E AïemFaculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université Côte D'Azur, CHUN, Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1306-783X
C CoulotFaculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université Côte D'Azur, CHUN, Nice, France.
S DoméjeanCentre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique EA 4847, Université Clermont Auvergne, UFR D'Odontologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4792-1777
Université Côte d'Azur · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuestionnaire surveys have been undertaken worldwide to investigate practices and knowledge related to carious lesion management, particularly in adults. The primary objective of this cross-sectional survey was to investigate restorative thresholds (RTs) used for carious lesions in primary molars by dentists practising paediatric dentistry in France. Dentists were surveyed by a specifically developed questionnaire based on clinical and radiographic caries classifications. The secondary objective was to explore restorative management strategies in primary molars.

methodsA structured questionnaire assessing RTs and management strategies for occlusal and approximal carious lesions of primary molars was anonymously and electronically administered via SurveyMonkey

resultsAmong 250 dentists surveyed, 201 responded (response rate 80.4%). Overall, 43% (n = 87) and 75% (n = 151) of respondents would place their RTs in enamel for occlusal and approximal lesions, respectively. Dentists with an exclusive practice of paediatric dentistry more frequently would choose a RT in dentine for approximal lesions than did other dentists (p = 0.010). A preparation technique including sound dental tissues was less frequent for occlusal than approximal lesions (n = 31; 15% vs n = 60; 30%). Overall, 75% (n = 151) of respondents used the same restorative material for occlusal and approximal lesions.

conclusionIn general, dentists practising paediatric dentistry in France overtreated lesions on primary molars, which contradicts minimal intervention recommendations. RTs are too often indicated for enamel-confined carious lesions.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDental Restoration, PermanentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesDentinDentistsFranceHumansMolarCarious lesion managementCarious lesionsChildrenPrimary molarsRestorative threshold

Identifiers

PMID33185858
OpenAlexW3098308011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.