Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33185847›Full record

Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2021

Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study.

Sandra Schönburg, Petra Anheuser, Jennifer Kranz, Paolo Fornara, Viktor Oubaid

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cognitive ergonomics and robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra Schönburg *Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. sandra.schoenburg@uk-halle.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1530-263X
Petra Anheuser *Department of Urology, Asclepius Clinic Wandsbek, Alphonsstrasse 14, 22043, Hamburg, Germany. petra.anheuser@web.de.
Jennifer KranzDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Paolo FornaraDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Viktor OubaidGerman Aerospace Centre (DLR), Hamburg, Germany.
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DESankt-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler · DEUniversity Hospital in Halle · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid rise of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has necessitated an efficient and standardized training curriculum. Cognitive training (CT) can significantly improve skills, such as attention, working memory and problem solving, and can enhance surgical capacity and support RAS training. This pilot study was carried out between 02/2019 and 04/2019. The participants included 33 student volunteers, randomized into 3 groups: group 1 received training using the da Vinci training simulator, group 2 received computer-based cognitive training, and group 3 was the control group without training. Before (T1) and after-training (T2), performance was measured. Additionally, expert ratings and self-evaluations were collected. Subjective evaluations of performance were supplemented by evaluations based on three scales from the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). In total, 25 probands remained with complete data for further analyses: n = 8 (group 1), n = 7 (group 2) and n = 10 (group 3). There were no significant differences in T1 and T2 among all three groups. The average training gain of group 1 and 2 was 15.87% and 24.6%, respectively, (a restricting condition is the loss of the last training session in group 2). Analyses of semi-structured psychological interviews (SPIs) revealed no significant differences for T1, but in T2, significance occurred at 'self-reflection' for group 2 (F(2.22) = 8.56; p < .005). The efficacy of CT in training highly complex and difficult procedures, such as RAS, is a proven and accepted fact. Further investigation involving higher numbers of training trials (while also being cost effective) should be performed.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresSimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceCognitionComputer SimulationHumansPilot ProjectsCognitive trainingPersonal traitsRobotic surgerySimulator trainingSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID33185847
PMCPMC8423692
OpenAlexW3106542366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.