ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2021
[Pain prevention: what is in the pipeline?]
Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 10% of the German population report chronic pain that has at least a moderate influence on everyday life. For instance, patients in Germany often experience an oversupply of diagnostics and therapy when suffering from mild back pain, while the care of patients with severe, chronic pain remains insufficient. Multimodal and interdisciplinary therapies are generally too seldomly used. Potentially preventive procedures are insufficiently investigated and used in current clinical practice and little is known about the mechanisms underlying chronification processes. In Germany, pain is still largely neglected in current clinical and basic science, as well as research funding. Furthermore, existing projects are often insufficiently connected with each other, thereby missing the unique opportunity of building synergies. To improve medical pain care and to enable participation in activities of daily life with the maximum radius, interdisciplinary clinical programs and cross-linking of basic and clinical research is necessary. The main objectives are to: (1) Strengthen basic research to investigate the underlying mechanisms of pain development and maintenance as well as of chronification processes; (2) improve patient care by adequate application of diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive procedures; (3) consolidate interdisciplinarity in pain research and patient care; (4) maintain participation of patients in social and in everyday life; and (5) achieve and maintain high quality standards in pain patient care. The following article provides an overview of the measures and advances currently being taken in pain research in Germany to close the above-mentioned gaps. The focus lies on current and future developments in the field of pain prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.