Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33185700›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2021

Contrasting effects of Rhizophagus irregularis versus bacterial and fungal seed endophytes on Trifolium repens plant-soil feedback.

Mohamed Idbella, Giuliano Bonanomi, Francesca De Filippis, Ghita Amor, Fatima Ezzahra Chouyia, Taoufiq Fechtali, Stefano Mazzoleni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamed IdbellaFaculty of Sciences and Techniques, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco. mohamed.idbella@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6303-3737
Giuliano BonanomiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy.
Francesca De FilippisDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy.
Ghita AmorFaculty of Sciences and Techniques, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.
Fatima Ezzahra ChouyiaFaculty of Sciences and Techniques, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.
Taoufiq FechtaliFaculty of Sciences and Techniques, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.
Stefano MazzoleniDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between plants and soil affect plant-plant interactions and community composition by modifying soils conditions in plant-soil feedback, where associated microbes have the most crucial role. Both arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and microbial seed endophytes have been demonstrated to influence, directly or indirectly, biotic or abiotic soil properties, thus affecting subsequent plant growth, and community structure. However, little is known about how plant endophyte communities, individually or in interaction with AMF, affect plant-soil feedback processes. Here, we investigated, through a manipulative experiment, the behavior of endophyte-free and endophyte-associated Trifolium repens plants grown in soils previously conditioned by conspecific endophyte-free and endophyte-associated plants, inoculated or not by Rhizophagus intraradices. Furthermore, we identified microbial endophytes directly from the inner tissues of seeds by high-throughput sequencing, to compare seed fungal and bacterial endophyte composition. Results demonstrated that the outcome of simultaneous occurrence of seed endophytes and AMF on plant behavior depended on matching the endophytic status, i.e., either the presence or absence of seed microbial endophytes, of the conditioning and response phase. Seed fungal endophytes generated strong conspecific negative feedback, while seed bacterial endophytes proved to shift the feedback from negative to positive. Moreover, the simultaneous occurrence of both seed endophytes with AMF could either generate or expand negative plant-soil feedback effects. Our results show that seed and root symbionts can play a significant role on setting conspecific plant-soil feedback.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaeTrifoliumEndophytesFeedbackFungiPlant RootsSeedsSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilAMFBacterial endophytesFungal endophytesRhizophagus intraradicesSoil-borne pathogens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.