ReviewDer Orthopade2021
[Treatment paths in the exoskeletal prosthetic care of the upper extremities].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe successful prosthetic treatment after amputations of the upper extremities has to deal with the high demands of adequate compensation for functional, sensitive and also habitual requirements. The best success can only be achieved if the involved disciplines of medicine, therapy and technology act in close dialogue with one another and pull together.
objectivesHow can an interdisciplinary understanding of prosthetic care of the upper extremity be created and implemented in corresponding treatment pathways?
methodsOver a period of several years, a committee of German experts in prosthetics developed a quality standard for prosthetic care of the upper extremity. In 2014, this work was published in the form of a compendium. In line with a defined treatment path, all common upper extremity amputation levels are systematically described, and their prosthetic requirements are explained and justified, and any peculiarities delineated.
resultsThe result is a structured and clear reference work that enables its readers to receive care-related, level-dependent information on prosthetic care. In the meantime, this work has also been included and implemented by many cost bearers as the basis for the corresponding aid supply contracts.
conclusionsDefined treatment paths contribute to a better interdisciplinary understanding and enable structured and quality-oriented care for amputated people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.