ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2021
Common Comorbidities that Alter Heart Failure Prognosis - Shaping New Thinking for Practice.
Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- HLM Staging and Treatment Benefit of SGLT2i Across Heart Failure Severity.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Venous thromboembolism in heart failure: incidence, phenotype-specific risk, and predictors in a large real-world cohort.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Iron Deficiency in Heart Failure: From ESC Guidelines to Clinical Practice at a Romanian Hospital.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Review
- A longitudinal study of changes in depressive symptoms and risk factors for congestive heart failure.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Point-of-care ultrasonography spotlight: Could venous excess ultrasound serve as a shared language for internists and intensivists?World journal of critical care medicine · 2024Review
- Comparison of short and long forms of the Flinders program of chronic disease SELF-management for participants starting SGLT-2 inhibitors for congestive heart failure (SELFMAN-HF): protocol for a prospective, observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Heart Failure Paradigms in the Developed World - A Reflection - Part 1Current cardiology reviews · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At least half of all heart failure (CHF) patients will have a comorbidity that could be undertreated, requires additional speciality input and/or polypharmacy. These patients are then at risk of iatrogenic and disease-related complications and readmissions if not closely supervised. Common comorbidities of relevance are cardiorenal and cardiometabolic syndromes (DM, obesity, OSA), chronic airways disease, elderly age, and accompanying pharmacotherapies. The structure of community practice often leaves primary, speciality, and allied health care in silos. For example, cardiology speciality training in Australia creates excellent sub-specialists to deliver diagnostic and therapeutic advances. A casualty of this process has been the gradual alienation of general cardiology toward general internal medical specialists and primary care practitioners. The consequences are largely noticed in community practice. The issue is compounded by suboptimal communication of information. This review explores these issues from a cardiology sub-speciality lens; firstly cross speciality areas that are important for cardiologists to maintain their skill, and finally, to obtain a brief overview of disease management and identify game-changing common denominators such as endothelial dysfunction and self-management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.