ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2021
Toolkit for assessing and addressing cognitive health in early psychosis: Evaluation of feasibility and utility in a coordinated specialty care setting.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Acceptability of Providing Cognitive Remediation in a Large USA System of Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Sensitivity and Specificity of Cognitive Health Screening in a Coordinated Specialty Care Setting.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Measuring Cognitive Impairments Associated With Schizophrenia in Clinical Practice: Overview of Current Challenges and Future Opportunities.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Review
- Personalized Cognitive Health in Psychiatry: Current State and the Promise of Computational Methods.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Review
- National Institute of Mental Health Support for Cognitive Treatment Development in Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Review
- Implementation of Cognitive Health Services in Large Systems of Care: Highlights From Coordinated Specialty Care for First Episode Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimMethods to identify and harness individual cognitive strengths while addressing relative weaknesses have the potential to complement recovery services for first-episode psychosis but systematic implementation is needed. We developed a cognitive health toolkit, trained teams from OnTrackNY, a network of coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs and examined toolkit feasibility and clinical utility during the first year of roll-out.
methodsThe toolkit includes a clinician manual, assessment and decision-making tools, and a menu of cognitive health service options. Assessment uses the WRAT5-Reading subtest and a new Self-Assessment of Cognitive Functioning which, together, determine participant- and clinician-perceived cognitive health need. Program-level data were analysed for rates of assessment, identification of cognitive health needs and cognitive health service provision.
resultsData from 18 OnTrackNY teams included 933 participants, including 310 new admissions. Across teams, 43.9% of newly admitted participants received a WRAT5-Reading and 41.3% received a self-assessment. Of all assessments completed in the study period, 50.7% were at or within 3-months of admission and 69.1% were within the first year of program participation. Cognitive health need was identified by self-report (57.6%) and clinician-report (69.9%) and led to provision of specific services, including psychoeducation, compensatory skills training and in some cases restorative cognitive training.
conclusionsPreliminary feasibility data are encouraging but barriers to assessment need to be identified and addressed. Rates of identified cognitive health need warrant further study of the implementation process and outcomes so that cognitive health assessment and treatment practices may ultimately be disseminated to CSC programs more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.