Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184931›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2021

Inter-individual variability in atrasentan exposure partly explains variability in kidney protection and fluid retention responses: A post hoc analysis of the SONAR trial.

Jeroen V Koomen, Jasper Stevens, George Bakris, Ricardo Correa-Rotter, Fan Fan Hou, Dalane W Kitzman, Donald Kohan, Hirofumi Makino, John J V McMurray, Hans-Henrik Parving and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Efficacy and safety of zibotentan and dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease: study design and baseline characteristics of the ZENITH-CKD trial.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Jeroen V KoomenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-3998
Jasper StevensDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1601-9008
George BakrisAmerican Society of Hypertension Comprehensive Hypertension Center, University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-1183-1267
Ricardo Correa-RotterNational Medical Science and Nutrition Institute Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fan Fan HouDivision of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, China.
Dalane W KitzmanWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Donald KohanDivision of Nephrology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Hirofumi MakinoOkayama University, Okayama, Japan.
John J V McMurrayBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6317-3975
Hans-Henrik ParvingDepartment of Medical Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vlado PerkovicGeorge Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sheldon W TobeDivision of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto and the Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dick de ZeeuwDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Hiddo J L HeerspinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3126-3730
University Medical Center Groningen · NLBritish Heart Foundation · GBInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXNanfang Hospital · CNOkayama University · JPSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Utah · USUNSW Sydney · AUWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate whether atrasentan plasma exposure explains between-patient variability in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) response, a surrogate for kidney protection, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) response, a surrogate for fluid expansion.

methodsType 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 4775) received 0.75 mg atrasentan for 6 weeks in the active run-in period. Individual area under the concentration-time-curve (AUC) was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model. The association between atrasentan AUC, other clinical characteristics, and UACR and BNP response, was estimated using linear regression.

resultsThe median atrasentan AUC was 43.8 ng.h/mL with a large variation among patients (2.5th-97.5th percentiles [P]: 12.6 to 197.5 ng.h/mL). Median UACR change at the end of enrichment was -36.0% and median BNP change was 8.7%, which also varied among patients (UACR, 2.5th-97.5th P: -76.2% to 44.5%; BNP, 2.5th-97.5th P: -71.5% to 300.0%). In the multivariable analysis, higher atrasentan AUC was associated with greater UACR reduction (4.88% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% confidence interval {CI}: 6.21% to 3.52%], P < .01) and greater BNP increase (3.08% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% CI: 1.12% to 4.11%], P < .01) independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate, haemoglobin or BNP. Caucasian patients compared with black patients had greater UACR reduction (7.06% [95% CI: 1.38% to 13.07%]) and also greater BNP increase (8.75% [95% CI: 1.65% to 15.35%]). UACR response was not associated with BNP response (r = 0.06).

conclusionAtrasentan plasma exposure varied among individual patients and partially explained between-patient variability in efficacy and safety response.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesAlbuminuriaAtrasentanDouble-Blind MethodGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidneyAtrasentanatrasentan, diabetic kidney disease, endothelin receptor antagonist, pharmacodynamics, randomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33184931
PMCPMC7839558
OpenAlexW3106244848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.