Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184742›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2021

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) technique training: what features influence learning time?

R Haridian Sosa Barrios, V Burguera Vion, C Campillo Trapero, S Ortego Pérez, E López Melero, M Álvarez Nadal, D Villa Hurtado, M Fernández Lucas, Maite E Rivera Gorrín

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R Haridian Sosa BarriosServicio de Nefrología, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain. haridian@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3292-0819
V Burguera VionServicio de Nefrología, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
C Campillo TraperoServicio de Nefrología, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
S Ortego PérezServicio de Nefrología, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
E López MeleroServicio de Nefrología, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
M Álvarez NadalServicio de Nefrología, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
D Villa HurtadoServicio de Nefrología, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
M Fernández LucasServicio de Nefrología, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Maite E Rivera GorrínServicio de Nefrología, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin peritoneal dialysis (PD) complications, peritonitis remains a primary challenge for the long-term success of the technique. Proper technique training is essential, since it reduces peritonitis rates, but the adequacy of training has not been standardized. Furthermore, factors influencing training duration have not been well identified.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed all consecutive training sessions of incident PD patients in our Unit from January 2001 to December 2018.

resultsOur analysis included 135 patients, 25.9% were diabetic and median Charlson index (CCI) was 4 (IQR 2-6). Above 13 sessions was chosen as the cut off between usual and prolonged training, as it was our cohort's 75th percentile: 23% (31) had an extended training duration as per our study definition and 77% (104) had a usual training duration. The number of training sessions required increased with age (Spearman Rho 0.404; p = 0.000001), diabetic status (p = 0.001), unemployment status (p = 0.046) and CCI (Spearman Rho 0.369; p = 0.00001). Neither gender, cohabitation status, scheduled PD start, education level nor referral origin, were significant factors impacting training duration. Requiring longer training (> 13 sessions) was a significant risk factor for higher peritonitis risk, but extended training was not related to a shorter technique survival.

conclusionNumber of PD training sessions depends on the patient's age and comorbidities, but is not related to social, educational or employment status. Prolonged training duration was a statistically significant predictor of higher peritonitis risk, but it was not related to shorter permanence in PD in our series. Identifying these patients since the training period would be useful to adapt training schedule as an early prevention strategy to minimize the risk of peritonitis and plan a preemptive retraining.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicPeritoneal DialysisAdultAgedAge FactorsComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeritonitisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsFirst peritonitisPeritoneal dialysisPeritoneal dialysis learningPeritoneal dialysis outcomeTraining

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.