Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184736›Full record

SynthesisReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2021

The experiences of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Jing He, Xiaoli Chen, Yuchen Wang, Yanqun Liu, Jinbing Bai

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Impact of psychological intervention combined with 1-day outpatient care on emotional well-being, glycemic control, and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preconception Perceptions, Knowledge and Behaviours of Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing He *School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, No.115, Dong Hu Road, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7654-1872
Xiaoli Chen *School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, No.115, Dong Hu Road, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
Yuchen WangSchool of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, No.115, Dong Hu Road, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
Yanqun LiuSchool of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, No.115, Dong Hu Road, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China. liuyanqun1984@163.com.
Jinbing BaiNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can have serious adverse effects on pregnant women and their fetuses. The purpose of this systematic review is to explore responses from women diagnosed with GDM and to describe their real-life experiences with self-management during pregnancy. The review provides insight into the physical, psychological, and social experiences of women with GDM; exploring these factors can help identify the challenges of glucose control and may provide targeted care and interventions to improve maternal and child health. Twelve databases were included in the initial article search, which was conducted on February 27, 2019. Two independent reviewers used the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research for methodological validity to assess articles for study inclusion. The final synthesized findings were graded according to the ConQual approach for establishing confidence. Ten studies (totaling 223 pregnant women with GDM), originating from 6 different countries, were included in the review. Of the 223 women, 171 had one pregnancy affected by GDM and 52 had two or more pregnancies affected by GDM. Based on the findings from these studies, three main themes emerged, which were synthesized from 10 separate categories and 46 individual findings: beliefs about illness and health; life-changing experiences and healthy expectations; and difficulties and needs. Both positive and negative experiences of pregnant women with GDM can be understood as a process of "continuous struggle and change". Understanding the experiences of women diagnosed with GDM can provide health care professionals with more knowledge of how women experience GDM and develop feasible interventions to reduce the risk of developing type II diabetes.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019132065.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ChildFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleQualitative ResearchExperiencesGestational diabetesPregnancyQualitativeSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.