Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184683›Full record

ArticleLifetime data analysis2021

Firth adjusted score function for monotone likelihood in the mixture cure fraction model.

Frederico Machado Almeida, Enrico Antônio Colosimo, Vinícius Diniz Mayrink

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frederico Machado AlmeidaDepartamento de Estatística, ICEx, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil.
Enrico Antônio ColosimoDepartamento de Estatística, ICEx, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil.
Vinícius Diniz MayrinkDepartamento de Estatística, ICEx, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil. vdm@est.ufmg.br.ORCID 0000-0002-5683-8326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models for situations where some individuals are long-term survivors, immune or non-susceptible to the event of interest, are extensively studied in biomedical research. Fitting a regression can be problematic in situations involving small sample sizes with high censoring rate, since the maximum likelihood estimates of some coefficients may be infinity. This phenomenon is called monotone likelihood, and it occurs in the presence of many categorical covariates, especially when one covariate level is not associated with any failure (in survival analysis) or when a categorical covariate perfectly predicts a binary response (in the logistic regression). A well known solution is an adaptation of the Firth method, originally created to reduce the estimation bias. The method provides a finite estimate by penalizing the likelihood function. Bias correction in the mixture cure model is a topic rarely discussed in the literature and it configures a central contribution of this work. In order to handle this point in such context, we propose to derive the adjusted score function based on the Firth method. An extensive Monte Carlo simulation study indicates good inference performance for the penalized maximum likelihood estimates. The analysis is illustrated through a real application involving patients with melanoma assisted at the Hospital das Clínicas/UFMG in Brazil. This is a relatively novel data set affected by the monotone likelihood issue and containing cured individuals.

Indexed as

Likelihood FunctionsSurvival AnalysisAlgorithmsBiasBrazilHumansMelanomaCure rate modelsEM algorithmFirth methodLogistic link functionMelanomaWeibull model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.