Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184581›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2020

Investigating the Interaction Between Circulating Tumor Cells and Local Hydrodynamics

Marianna Pepona, Peter Balogh, Daniel F Puleri, William F Hynes, Claire Robertson, Karen Dubbin, Javier Alvarado, Monica L Moya, Amanda Randles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marianna PeponaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC USA.
Peter BaloghDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC USA.
Daniel F PuleriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC USA.
William F HynesMaterials Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA USA.
Claire RobertsonMaterials Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA USA.
Karen DubbinMaterials Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA USA.
Javier AlvaradoMaterials Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA USA.
Monica L MoyaMaterials Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA USA.
Amanda RandlesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6318-3885

Funding

Toward coupled multiphysics models of hemodynamics on leadership systemsDP5OD019876 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRNC LVRMR NAT LAB · PI RANDLES, AMANDA E · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NIH HHS DP5 OD019876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe biological and mechanical properties of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in combination with the hemodynamics affect the preference of metastatic sites in the vasculature. Despite the extensive literature on the effects of biological properties on cell adhesion, the effects of hydrodynamic forces on primary attachment remains an active area of research. Using simulations in conjunction with experimentation, we provide new insight into the interplay of CTCs dynamics and local hydrodynamics.

methodsA flow experiment of CTC attachment was performed within a bioprinted, double branching endothelialized vessel. Simulations of fluid flow and CTC transport in the reconstructed and idealized bifurcated vessel were respectively performed by HARVEY, our in-house massively parallel computational fluid dynamics solver. HARVEY is based on the lattice Boltzmann and finite element methods to model the fluid and cells dynamics. The immersed boundary method is employed for resolving the fluid-structure interaction.

resultsCTC attachment was quantified experimentally at all regions of the complex vessel. The results demonstrate a clear preference for CTCs to attach at the branch points. To elucidate the effect of the vessel topology on the location of attachment, a fluid-only simulation was performed assessing the differences in the hydrodynamics along the vessel. CTC transport in idealized bifurcated vessels was subsequently studied to examine the effects of cell deformability on the local hydrodynamics patterns and, thus, the preference of attachment sites.

conclusionsThe current work provides evidence on the correlation of the hydrodynamics forces arising from the vessel topology and CTC properties on the attachment regions.

Indexed as

Cell deformabilityCirculating tumor cellHemodynamicsResidence timeWall shear stress

Identifiers

PMID33184581
PMCPMC7596168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.