ArticleJournal of human hypertension2021
Prognostic value of arterial stiffness according to the cardiovascular risk profiles.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanotyping of Organoids for Assessing Drug-Induced Injuries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity According to Subjects' Clinical Characteristics: Data From Analysis of 10,597 Subjects.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Arterial stiffness and hypertension.Clinical hypertension · 2023Review
- Preclinical Orthostatic Abnormalities May Predict Early Increase in Vascular Stiffness in Different Age Groups: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Central Aortic Pressure between Women with Preeclampsia and Normotensive Postpartum Women from an Urban Region of Western Mexico.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Insight into the Evolving Role of PCSK9.Metabolites · 2022Review
- Comparison of the Association Between Arterial Stiffness Indices and Heart Failure in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk: A Retrospective Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is not clear whether the influence of arterial stiffness depends on the subject's cardiovascular risk status. This study was performed to assess the prognostic value of arterial stiffness according to different cardiovascular risk profiles. A total of 11,767 subjects (61 years and 58% males) who underwent brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) measurement were retrospectively analyzed. Subjects were stratified into three groups: (1) those with traditional risk factor ≤1 and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), (2) those with traditional risk factors ≥2 and without ASCVD, or (3) those with documented ASCVD. Composite events of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and stroke were assessed during the clinical follow-up period. Compared to patients with risk factor ≤1, those with risk factor ≥2 and those with ASCVD were older, and more frequently had unfavorable laboratory findings, and higher baPWV values. During the median follow-up of 1329 days (interquartile range, 570-1,965 days), there were 350 composite events (3.0%). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, higher baPWV value was independently associated with higher incidence rate of composite events even after controlling for potential confounders in all three groups (P < 0.05 for each). In this study, it was found that baPWV was independently associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular events irrespective of baseline cardiovascular risk profiles, suggesting that baPWV is useful for risk stratification in mass screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33184487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.