ArticleScientific reports2020
Normal recognition of famous voices in developmental prosopagnosia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left hemisphere abnormalities in face-selective activation and functional connectivity in developmental prosopagnosia.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- This condition impacts every aspect of my life: A survey to understand the experience of living with developmental prosopagnosia.PloS one · 2025Article
- Face naming and recollection represent key memory deficits in developmental prosopagnosia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024Article
- Familial Transmission of Developmental Prosopagnosia: New Case Reports from an Extended Family and Identical Twins.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- A new approach to diagnosing and researching developmental prosopagnosia: Excluded cases are impaired too.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Neural Correlates of Voice Learning with Distinctive and Non-Distinctive Faces.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- The Twenty Item Prosopagnosia Index (PI20) provides meaningful evidence of face recognition impairment.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Musicianship Influences Language Effect on Musical Pitch Perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The impact of low vision on social function: The potential importance of lost visual social cues.Journal of optometryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is a condition characterised by lifelong face recognition difficulties. Recent neuroimaging findings suggest that DP may be associated with aberrant structure and function in multimodal regions of cortex implicated in the processing of both facial and vocal identity. These findings suggest that both facial and vocal recognition may be impaired in DP. To test this possibility, we compared the performance of 22 DPs and a group of typical controls, on closely matched tasks that assessed famous face and famous voice recognition ability. As expected, the DPs showed severe impairment on the face recognition task, relative to typical controls. In contrast, however, the DPs and controls identified a similar number of voices. Despite evidence of interactions between facial and vocal processing, these findings suggest some degree of dissociation between the two processing pathways, whereby one can be impaired while the other develops typically. A possible explanation for this dissociation in DP could be that the deficit originates in the early perceptual encoding of face structure, rather than at later, post-perceptual stages of face identity processing, which may be more likely to involve interactions with other modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.