Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184364›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

AMH has no role in predicting oocyte quality in women with advanced age undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles.

Xiuliang Dai, Yufeng Wang, Haiyan Yang, Tingting Gao, Chunmei Yu, Fang Cao, Xiyang Xia, Jun Wu, Xianju Zhou, Li Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Association between High AMH Levels in PCOS Patients and IVF/ICSI Outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiuliang DaiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Yufeng WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Haiyan YangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Tingting GaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Chunmei YuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Fang CaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Xiyang XiaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Jun WuResearch Center for Bone and Stem Cells, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China. wjxue1988@njmu.edu.cn.
Xianju ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510315, Guangdong, China. xianju_zhou@yahoo.com.
Li ChenDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China. CZRCchenli@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been widely acknowledged that anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a golden marker of ovarian reserve. Declined ovarian reserve (DOR), based on experience from reproductive-aged women, refers to both the quantitative and qualitative reduction in oocytes. This view is challenged by a recent study clearly showing that the quality of oocytes is similar in young women undergoing IVF cycles irrespective of the level of AMH. However, it remains elusive whether AMH indicates oocyte quality in women with advanced age (WAA). The aim of this study was to investigate this issue. In the present study, we retrospectively analysed the data generated from a total of 492 IVF/ICSI cycles (from January 2017 to July 2020), and these IVF/ICSI cycles contributed 292 embryo transfer (ET) cycles (from June 2017 to September 2019, data of day 3 ET were included for analysis) in our reproductive centre. Based on the level of AMH, all patients (= > 37 years old) were divided into 2 groups: the AMH high (H) group and the AMH low (L) group. The parameters of in vitro embryo development and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The results showed that women in the L group experienced severe DOR, as demonstrated by a higher rate of primary diagnosis of DOR, lower antral follicle count (AFC), higher level of basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and cancelation cycles, lower level of E2 production on the day of surge, and fewer oocytes and MII oocytes retrieved. Compared with women in the H group, women in the L group showed slightly reduced top embryo formation rate but a similar normal fertilization rate and blastocyst formation rate. More importantly, we found that the rates of implantation, spontaneous miscarriage and livebirth were similar between the two groups, while the pregnancy rate was significantly reduced in the L group compared with the H group. Further analysis indicated that the higher pregnancy rate of women in the H group may be due to more top embryos transferred per cycle. Due to an extremely low implantation potential for transfer of non-top embryos from WAA (= > 37 years old) in our reproductive centre, we assumed that all the embryos that implanted may result from the transfer of top embryos. Based on this observation, we found that the ratio of embryos that successfully implanted or eventually led to a livebirth to top embryos transferred was similar between the H and the L groups. Furthermore, women with clinical pregnancy or livebirth in the H or L group did not show a higher level of serum AMH but were younger than women with non-pregnancy or non-livebirth. Taken together, this study showed that AMH had a limited role in predicting in vitro embryo developmental potential and had no role in predicting the in vivo embryo developmental potential, suggesting that in WAA, AMH should not be used as a marker of oocyte quality. This study supports the view that the accumulation of top embryos via multiple oocyte retrieval times is a good strategy for the treatment of WAA.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Mullerian HormoneFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleLive BirthOocytesOvarian FollicleOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAnti-Mullerian Hormone

Identifiers

PMID33184364
PMCPMC7661530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.