Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184337›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A birdstrike risk assessment model and its application at Ordos Airport, China.

Yuanyuan Hu, Pu Xing, Fan Yang, Gang Feng, Guisheng Yang, Zhengwang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Practical Method to Assess Bird Strike Risk in Air Operations Using a Count-Based Risk Mitigation Tool.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuanyuan HuSchool of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010070, China.
Pu XingThe Hohhot Branch of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Civil Airport Group Co., LTD, Hohhot, 010070, China.
Fan YangSchool of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010070, China.
Gang FengSchool of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010021, China.
Guisheng YangSchool of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010070, China. 13848146598@163.com.
Zhengwang ZhangSchool of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birdstrikes are an important threat to aviation safety. A standardized, scientific process for assessing birdstrike risk could prevent accidents, thereby improving the flight safety and reducing economic losses. However, China currently lacks a unified birdstrike risk assessment system. Here, we propose and validate a new model for assessing birdstrike risk in order to fill that need. The model consists of two elements. First, empirical data are collected on the occurrence of birds at the airport and in a surrounding 8 km buffer. Second, each species is evaluated with a risk assessment matrix that takes into account the number of birds, weight, flight altitude, a tendency to cluster, and range of activity. These five factors allow each species to be divided into one of three risk levels: high danger (level 3), moderate danger (level 2) and low danger (level 1). We propose corresponding birdstrike prevention measures for each level. We apply this method to the civil aviation airport in Ordos, China. We found that 20 of the 118 species of birds in and around the airport were high danger birds (level 3). To validate this process, we compared these species with records of birdstrike accidents in a database maintained by the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) for 2007-2016. We found that 42% of the species we identified as high risk had been involved in at least one birdstrike accident, and that the remaining 58% belonged to families that appeared in the database. The high degree of overlap gives us high confidence in the practicality of our risk assessment model, which is based on the risk management concept of ISO 31000. Critically, this new model and method for predicting bird strike risk can be replicated at other airports around the world, even where no extensive records have been kept of past birdstrikes.

Indexed as

BirdsModels, StatisticalAccidents, AviationAirportsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChinaDatabases as TopicFlight, AnimalRiskRisk AssessmentRisk ManagementSafety

Identifiers

PMID33184337
PMCPMC7661541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.