Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184333›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Microalgae-blend tilapia feed eliminates fishmeal and fish oil, improves growth, and is cost viable.

Pallab K Sarker, Anne R Kapuscinski, Brandi McKuin, Devin S Fitzgerald, Hannah M Nash, Connor Greenwood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Biorefinery Products FromAquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Towards Sustainable Aquafeeds: Microalgal (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pallab K SarkerEnvironmental Studies Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA. psarker@ucsc.edu.
Anne R KapuscinskiEnvironmental Studies Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Brandi McKuinEnvironmental Studies Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Devin S FitzgeraldEnvironmental Studies Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Hannah M NashHealth Professions Program, Sciences, Mathematics and Biotechnology, University of California Berkeley Extension, 1995 University Ave., Suite 200, Berkley, CA, 94704-7000, USA.
Connor GreenwoodEnvironmental Studies Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
University of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquafeed manufacturers have reduced, but not fully eliminated, fishmeal and fish oil and are seeking cost competitive replacements. We combined two commercially available microalgae, to produce a high-performing fish-free feed for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)-the world's second largest group of farmed fish. We substituted protein-rich defatted biomass of Nannochloropsis oculata (leftover after oil extraction for nutraceuticals) for fishmeal and whole cells of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-rich Schizochytrium sp. as substitute for fish oil. We found significantly better (p < 0.05) growth, weight gain, specific growth rate, and best (but not significantly different) feed conversion ratio using the fish-free feed compared with the reference diet. Fish-free feed also yielded higher (p < 0.05) fillet lipid, DHA, and protein content (but not significantly different). Furthermore, fish-free feed had the highest degree of in-vitro protein hydrolysis and protein digestibility. The median economic conversion ratio of the fish-free feed ($0.95/kg tilapia) was less than the reference diet ($1.03/kg tilapia), though the median feed cost ($0.68/kg feed) was slightly greater than that of the reference feed ($0.64/kg feed) (p < 0.05). Our work is a step toward eliminating reliance on fishmeal and fish oil with evidence of a cost-competitive microalgae-based tilapia feed that improves growth metrics and the nutritional quality of farmed fish.

Indexed as

MicroalgaeAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDocosahexaenoic AcidsFish ProductsFish ProteinsTilapiaWeight GainDocosahexaenoic AcidsFish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33184333
PMCPMC7665073
OpenAlexW3103977041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.