Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184332›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Protecting nursery areas without fisheries management is not enough to conserve the most endangered parrotfish of the Atlantic Ocean.

Natalia C Roos, Guilherme O Longo, Maria Grazia Pennino, Ronaldo B Francini-Filho, Adriana R Carvalho

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of protection on large-bodied reef fishes in the western Indian Ocean.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia C RoosMarine Ecology Laboratory, Department of Oceanography and Limnology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, 59014-002, Brazil. nataliaroos@gmail.com.
Guilherme O LongoMarine Ecology Laboratory, Department of Oceanography and Limnology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, 59014-002, Brazil.
Maria Grazia PenninoFishing Ecology, Management and Economics Group, Department of Ecology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, 59098-970, Brazil.
Ronaldo B Francini-FilhoBenthic Ecology Laboratory, Marine Biology Center (CEBIMar), University of São Paulo, São Sebastião, SP, 11612-109, Brazil.
Adriana R CarvalhoFishing Ecology, Management and Economics Group, Department of Ecology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, 59098-970, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a primary strategy for marine conservation worldwide, having as a common goal the protection of essential habitats to enhance fish population recovery. However, MPAs alone may not be effective because species are not isolated from critical impacts occurring outside their boundaries. We evaluated how protecting critical nursery habitats affect the population of an important fishing target, using a 6-year database to predict juvenile hotspots and estimate population trends of the endemic and endangered parrotfish Scarus trispinosus within a mosaic of MPAs at the Abrolhos Bank, NE Brazil. We found that important nursery habitats are within no-take areas, but both juvenile and adult populations still show a declining trend over time. MPAs failed to ensure population maintenance and recovery likely due to overfishing in adjacent areas and the lack of compliance to management rules within multiple-use and within no-take MPAs. MPAs alone are not enough to protect ecologically important endangered species, but is still one of the only conservation strategies, particularly in developing countries. Our results shed light on the need for a wider adoption of more effective conservation policies in addition to MPAs, both in Brazil and in countries with similar governance contexts.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesAnimalsAtlantic OceanBiomassFisheriesFishesReproduction

Identifiers

PMID33184332
PMCPMC7661516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.