Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184304›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Selection of sponge-associated bacteria with high potential for the production of antibacterial compounds.

Riyanti, Walter Balansa, Yang Liu, Abha Sharma, Sanja Mihajlovic, Christoph Hartwig, Benedikt Leis, Frets Jonas Rieuwpassa, Frans Gruber Ijong, Heike Wägele and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  9. Identification and Antimicrobial Potential of Marine Sponges (International journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tropical life sciences research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

RiyantiInstitute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Walter BalansaDepartment of Fisheries and Marine Science, Politeknik Negeri Nusa Utara, 95821, North Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Yang LiuInstitute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Abha SharmaInstitute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Sanja MihajlovicFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Branch for Bioresources, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Christoph HartwigFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Branch for Bioresources, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Benedikt LeisFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Branch for Bioresources, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Frets Jonas RieuwpassaDepartment of Fisheries and Marine Science, Politeknik Negeri Nusa Utara, 95821, North Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Frans Gruber IjongDepartment of Fisheries and Marine Science, Politeknik Negeri Nusa Utara, 95821, North Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Heike WägeleCentre of Molecular Biodiversity, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Gabriele M KönigInstitute for Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Till F SchäberleInstitute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany. till.f.schaeberle@agrar.uni-giessen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of sponge-associated bacteria for the biosynthesis of natural products with antibacterial activity was evaluated. In a preliminary screening 108 of 835 axenic isolates showed antibacterial activity. Active isolates were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selection of the most promising strains was done in a championship like approach, which can be done in every lab and field station without expensive equipment. In a competition assay, strains that inhibited most of the other strains were selected. In a second round, the strongest competitors from each host sponge competed against each other. To rule out that the best competitors selected in that way represent similar strains with the same metabolic profile, BOX PCR experiments were performed, and extracts of these strains were analysed using metabolic fingerprinting. This proved that the strains are different and have various metabolic profiles, even though belonging to the same genus, i.e. Bacillus. Furthermore, it was shown that co-culture experiments triggered the production of compounds with antibiotic activity, i.e. surfactins and macrolactin A. Since many members of the genus Bacillus possess the genetic equipment for the biosynthesis of these compounds, a potential synergism was analysed, showing synergistic effects between C14-surfactin and macrolactin A against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillusDrug Resistance, BacterialLipopeptidesMacrolidesMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPeptides, CyclicPoriferaAnti-Bacterial AgentsLipopeptidesmacrolactin AMacrolidesPeptides, Cyclicsurfactin peptide

Identifiers

PMID33184304
PMCPMC7665026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.