ArticleNature communications2020
3D-printed cellular tips for tuning fork atomic force microscopy in shear mode.
Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Two-Photon Lithography of 3D Inorganic Microstructures: Glass, Ceramics, Metals, and Carbon.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Bionic Perception of Surface Adhesion via a Magnetized Spring-like Sensor with Axial Stretchability.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Fully bio-based composite and modular metastructures.Advanced composites and hybrid materials · 2025Article
- Tailored Microcantilever Optimization for Multifrequency Force Microscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Measurement of Interfacial Adhesion Force with a 3D-Printed Fiber-Tip Microforce Sensor.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Micro 3D printing of a functional MEMS accelerometer.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2022Article
- Fiber-tip polymer clamped-beam probe for high-sensitivity nanoforce measurements.Light, science & applications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional atomic force microscopy (AFM) tips have remained largely unchanged in nanomachining processes, constituent materials, and microstructural constructions for decades, which limits the measurement performance based on force-sensing feedbacks. In order to save the scanning images from distortions due to excessive mechanical interactions in the intermittent shear-mode contact between scanning tips and sample, we propose the application of controlled microstructural architectured material to construct AFM tips by exploiting material-related energy-absorbing behavior in response to the tip-sample impact, leading to visual promotions of imaging quality. Evidenced by numerical analysis of compressive responses and practical scanning tests on various samples, the essential scanning functionality and the unique contribution of the cellular buffer layer to imaging optimization are strongly proved. This approach opens new avenues towards the specific applications of cellular solids in the energy-absorption field and sheds light on novel AFM studies based on 3D-printed tips possessing exotic properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.