Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184262›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A convolutional neural network segments yeast microscopy images with high accuracy.

Nicola Dietler, Matthias Minder, Vojislav Gligorovski, Augoustina Maria Economou, Denis Alain Henri Lucien Joly, Ahmad Sadeghi, Chun Hei Michael Chan, Mateusz Koziński, Martin Weigert, Anne-Florence Bitbol and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Glucose repression ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Establishing MS2-MCP-based single-molecule RNA visualization inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicola DietlerLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Matthias MinderLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Vojislav GligorovskiLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1804-8913
Augoustina Maria EconomouLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4961-7354
Denis Alain Henri Lucien JolyLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ahmad SadeghiLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chun Hei Michael ChanLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mateusz KozińskiComputer Vision Laboratory, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3187-518X
Martin WeigertInstitute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7780-9057
Anne-Florence BitbolInstitute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-494X
Sahand Jamal RahiLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. sahand.rahi@epfl.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-6442-7087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of cell borders ('segmentation') in microscopy images constitutes a bottleneck for large-scale experiments. For the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, current segmentation methods face challenges when cells bud, crowd, or exhibit irregular features. We present a convolutional neural network (CNN) named YeaZ, the underlying training set of high-quality segmented yeast images (>10 000 cells) including mutants, stressed cells, and time courses, as well as a graphical user interface and a web application ( www.quantsysbio.com/data-and-software ) to efficiently employ, test, and expand the system. A key feature is a cell-cell boundary test which avoids the need for fluorescent markers. Our CNN is highly accurate, including for buds, and outperforms existing methods on benchmark images, indicating it transfers well to other conditions. To demonstrate how efficient large-scale image processing uncovers new biology, we analyze the geometries of ≈2200 wild-type and cyclin mutant cells and find that morphogenesis control occurs unexpectedly early and gradually.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerCell CycleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSoftware

Identifiers

PMID33184262
PMCPMC7665014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.